There is an expression in Chinese, yinjian buyuan (殷鑒不遠), meaning “[the lessons of the fall of] the Yin Dynasty [also known as Shang Dynasty] are still fresh in the memory.” It is a reminder of recent historical precedent serving as a lesson that it would be foolish to ignore.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) failed in his bid to win the presidency in Saturday’s election, garnering 26.46 percent of the vote. Given that this was his first presidential election, and that he was up against the established and well-resourced Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), this was certainly no failure: As a basis from which to build upon politically, it could be considered a resounding success.
However, the vote count is no guarantee of longevity for Ko or his party. They would do well to learn from historical precedent.
In 2000, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) left the KMT to run as an independent.
His bid for the presidency came remarkably close to success, getting 36.84 percent of the vote, losing to former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) by less than 3 percentage points and leaving the KMT candidate, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), in the dust. Soong would have won had the KMT nominated him, and had it not been for a corruption scandal that hurt his campaign. Given the result, he could legitimately claim to have been the popular choice of the pro-KMT, blue-leaning electorate.
Soong founded the PFP and initially had some success in building a presence for his party in the legislature. In 2001, the PFP had 46 legislators, albeit in a much larger legislature — 225 seats to today’s 113 — but this number crashed to three out of 113 in 2012 and zero in 2020.
In opposition, the PFP failed to differentiate itself from the KMT, both being major players in the pan-blue camp and obstructing Chen’s agenda. Soong even joined the Lien ticket in 2004 in his second unsuccessful attempt to defeat Chen.
As with Ko and the TPP, when people cast their ballots for PFP candidates, they were essentially voting for the charismatic chairman. However, the inability of the PFP to differentiate itself from the KMT, showing it to be a vehicle for the chairman’s political ambition, led to its loss of influence, importance and electoral support. Soong’s flame flickered and died. When he announced that the 2020 election would be his final bid for the presidency, the future of the PFP was brought into question.
Ko started his presidential campaign saying that his party was above the DPP-KMT rivalry and promised to offer a new politics. He quickly jettisoned that idea when he was offered an — ultimately unsuccessful — alliance with the KMT.
His legislators hold the key to the passage or rejection of policy in a legislature in which neither the KMT nor the DPP have a majority. How Ko wields this power could determine his and his party’s political survival.
If it uses its decisive vote judiciously, it could gain the respect of the main parties and show them that they would need to present reasonable arguments if they want the TPP to support them. Ko and his party must work with the other two parties to devise reasonable legislation and not to block the government’s agenda for purely political reasons.
One of the ways Ko could demonstrate this is by not allowing partisan and divisive KMT legislator-at-large in waiting Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to become legislative speaker.
At the same time, TPP legislators need to cultivate a recognizable, unified political identity and not allow themselves to be merely their chairman’s political avatars.
The longevity of Ko and his party depends on their ability to do so.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past