The three vice presidential candidates acted as expected in a televised debate on Jan. 1, and completely in line with the characteristics of their positions and backgrounds.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vice presidential candidate Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) played it safe and made prompt and flexible responses when challenged, judiciously avoiding traps and calmly restating her stance.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator and vice presidential candidate Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) performed better overall than in the previous vice presidential debate, but her contradictory and unfounded statements about the cross-strait service trade agreement proved the TPP’s intention to restart the talks.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) took center stage at the debate. Jaw, as the KMT’s famous pundit and head of the “blue fighters” faction, continued to play his role as the irresponsible host of political talk shows.
According to the Asia Fact Check Lab, some of Jaw’s claims did not reflect reality. He said that residents in the neighborhood of a nuclear plant are happy to receive radioactive waste and that Taylor Swift turned down the offer to perform in Taiwan due to geopolitical risks.
Jaw made use of one-sided information and not-evidence-based statements to manipulate public opinion. That is a common dirty trick of the KMT: throwing mud at their opponents.
Rumors out of thin air go viral with the help of pan-blue media and social media platforms to influence the target audience’s opinions. Falsehood disseminates widely and finally escalates into more extreme and polarized debate.
The DPP is thus asked to spend time on making clarifications in response to the disinformation prior to tackling more urgent cases. The process is a waste of time and resources, and drags people into endless mudslinging. Such mudslinging is why young people have got sick of politics.
The mud finally turns into the soil in which TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has flourished.
It is not true that the KMT and the DPP are rotten. Considering what Ko has done and said, he never contemplated creating new, clean politics.
Instead, he picks up the pan-blue camp’s propaganda tools, well-packaged and transformed to expand the size of the mudslinging. Ko, being questioned, beats around the bush and even throws mud at others to start a new fight and to divert attention from himself.
With widespread use of the Internet, the blue camp and the white camp have targeted satellite media rather than terrestrial media. The mudslinging used to occur in traditional media, television and broadcasting now extends to the Internet.
That has a profound effect on Taiwan’s future and is a problem that the pan-green camp should seriously consider and confront.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises