The three vice presidential candidates acted as expected in a televised debate on Jan. 1, and completely in line with the characteristics of their positions and backgrounds.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vice presidential candidate Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) played it safe and made prompt and flexible responses when challenged, judiciously avoiding traps and calmly restating her stance.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator and vice presidential candidate Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) performed better overall than in the previous vice presidential debate, but her contradictory and unfounded statements about the cross-strait service trade agreement proved the TPP’s intention to restart the talks.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) took center stage at the debate. Jaw, as the KMT’s famous pundit and head of the “blue fighters” faction, continued to play his role as the irresponsible host of political talk shows.
According to the Asia Fact Check Lab, some of Jaw’s claims did not reflect reality. He said that residents in the neighborhood of a nuclear plant are happy to receive radioactive waste and that Taylor Swift turned down the offer to perform in Taiwan due to geopolitical risks.
Jaw made use of one-sided information and not-evidence-based statements to manipulate public opinion. That is a common dirty trick of the KMT: throwing mud at their opponents.
Rumors out of thin air go viral with the help of pan-blue media and social media platforms to influence the target audience’s opinions. Falsehood disseminates widely and finally escalates into more extreme and polarized debate.
The DPP is thus asked to spend time on making clarifications in response to the disinformation prior to tackling more urgent cases. The process is a waste of time and resources, and drags people into endless mudslinging. Such mudslinging is why young people have got sick of politics.
The mud finally turns into the soil in which TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has flourished.
It is not true that the KMT and the DPP are rotten. Considering what Ko has done and said, he never contemplated creating new, clean politics.
Instead, he picks up the pan-blue camp’s propaganda tools, well-packaged and transformed to expand the size of the mudslinging. Ko, being questioned, beats around the bush and even throws mud at others to start a new fight and to divert attention from himself.
With widespread use of the Internet, the blue camp and the white camp have targeted satellite media rather than terrestrial media. The mudslinging used to occur in traditional media, television and broadcasting now extends to the Internet.
That has a profound effect on Taiwan’s future and is a problem that the pan-green camp should seriously consider and confront.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS