The advertisement could read as follows: Landlocked country seeks a stretch of seacoast; payment for lease or purchase is negotiable, but cash is out of the question; motivated buyer is prepared to sweeten any contract with some freebies.
Sovereign real-estate deals might sound like ancient history — but they are still a thing. Even this year, a nation’s territory could be a commodity to be sold or rented at the right price. The practice might sound like pillage, but it is a better alternative to military coercion. On Monday, Ethiopia, the world’s most populous country without sea access, signed a preliminary deal to rent a 20km expanse of coast from its neighbor for half a century. Further negotiations, including over price and payment terms, are expected, and a final deal could come as soon as this year.
The problem? Well, there are many. For starters, the seller is a breakaway nation called Somaliland, which lacks international standing. The UN-recognized owner of the land — Somalia — says the deal is illegal. Then there is also the question of money: Ethiopia, embroiled in a simmering civil war, is an impoverished nation that defaulted on its international sovereign debt on Christmas day; instead of cash, it is offering a chunk of its state-owned airline. Ethiopia is also throwing in a diplomatic freebie: It would accept Somaliland as an independent state, further inflaming tensions in the Horn of Africa. The region is already witnessing several armed conflicts, plus mounting piracy in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, including across the sea from Yemen. So far, only Taiwan formally recognizes Somaliland as a nation, despite the African region having declared its independence in 1991.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The African continent’s last experiment with creating an independent state — South Sudan, in 2011 — did not work as planned, with the country falling back into civil conflict.
Splitting Somalia into two — or even three, as another breakaway region of Somalia called Puntland could follow suit — could create further failed states in a region that controls the mouth of the Red Sea. As such, the deal between Ethiopia and Somaliland is more than a historical oddity: It could deepen difficulties in a crucial choke point for global trade.
The history of international relations is dotted with countries buying or renting land from other sovereigns. In an early example, Scotland bought the Isle of Man and several other territories from Norway in 1266. Over the following centuries, countries including France, Russia, Denmark, the UK and Brazil engaged in land transactions. The US is in a class of its own: It bought large chunks of land from France in the Louisiana Purchase of the Mississippi basin; Florida from Spain; and Alaska from Russia as it assembled its transcontinental land mass.
The two most recent examples of sovereign land deals came in 1958 and 1963. In the former, Pakistan bought the port city of Gwadar, until then an enclave controlled by Oman, for the equivalent of US$2 billion in today’s money. In the latter, Germany bought back three small towns that it lost to the Netherlands at the end of World War II for the equivalent of 715 million euros — US$780 million today. Since then, the market for sovereign land acquisition has dried up. International borders have changed, mainly due to conflict. For example, Ethiopia lost its access to the sea in 1993 after Eritrea’s war for independence. Not too far away, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have been negotiating the fate of two islands in the Red Sea. Riyadh and Cairo agreed in 2017 that the Tiran and Sanafir islands in the northern Red Sea would be owned by Saudi Arabia. Shortly before the 2017 deal was signed, Saudi Arabia agreed to provide more than US$20 billion in financial and oil aid to Cairo, prompting many to see the two agreements as linked. Since then, Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, under economic pressure at home, has been seeking further financial incentives. Of course, it takes two to deal, and the wannabe buyer often finds no seller or it thinks it already owns the land, such as in the current case of Venezuela claiming land controlled by Guyana. I do not see Ukraine renting its land to Russia — or Moscow offering to pay Kyiv.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of The World For Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises