In a televised policy presentation, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), said he opposed the Ministry of Labor signing a memorandum of understanding with India that would allow 100,000 Indian workers to come to Taiwan.
This would take away employment opportunities from Taiwanese workers and lead to social unrest, Hou said.
Even though the ministry has repeatedly said the agreement would not allow 100,000 Indian workers to arrive at the same time, Hou’s camp continues to present a false narrative of the nature of the deal. His campaign is trying to cast the Indian workers in a bad light, scare Taiwanese and add stress to the otherwise friendly ties between Taiwan and India.
It has been 32 years since Taiwan opened its doors to migrant workers, with the total number reaching about 750,000. Although the government’s policy has not kept pace with the times, and the old-fashioned laws and regulations are highly criticized, the government has never had the power to tell Taiwanese employers which foreign workers to employ, and it is certainly not able to designate which countries they should come from.
The claim that the policy would lead to 100,000 Indian workers arriving in Taiwan in one fell swoop is therefore quite absurd.
Look at a similar situation: the opening up to Vietnamese workers more than 20 years ago. Even with Hanoi’s annual quota for workers in Taiwan, it took more than a decade for the total number of Vietnamese workers to reach 100,000.
Therefore, Hou’s claim of 100,000 Indian workers immediately coming to work in Taiwan proves that his team is incapable of putting forward an effective policy on foreign labor, and that they are using the rumor to confuse the public and scare voters.
In addition to smearing the Ministry of Labor for seeking new sources of migrant workers, Hou has proposed restarting the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement with China, which would allow Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan.
That is even more worrying. The restart of negotiations on the service trade pact and the idea of signing such an agreement would allow Chinese families to move to Taiwan as “investment immigrants” for as little as US$200,000. With China’s current economic strength, it would not be too difficult to send millions of people to Taiwan.
If the government opens Taiwan up to low-paid Chinese workers as investment immigrants, migrant workers from other countries would find it difficult to compete with them in every industry.
Moreover, allowing Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan would affect employment opportunities for young Taiwanese. This issue should indeed be taken seriously.
Steve Kuan is a former chairman of the Taipei and New Taipei City employment service institute associations.
Translated by Eddy Chang
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
The following case, which I experienced as an interpreter, illustrates that many issues in Taiwan’s legal system originate from law enforcement personnel. The problem stems not so much from their education and training, but their personal attitude — characterized by excessive self-confidence paired with a lack of accountability. One day at 10:30am, I was called to a police station in New Taipei City for an emergency. I arrived an hour later. A man was tied to a chair, having been arrested at the airport due to an outstanding arrest warrant. It quickly became apparent that the case was related to
RSS