In a televised policy presentation, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), said he opposed the Ministry of Labor signing a memorandum of understanding with India that would allow 100,000 Indian workers to come to Taiwan.
This would take away employment opportunities from Taiwanese workers and lead to social unrest, Hou said.
Even though the ministry has repeatedly said the agreement would not allow 100,000 Indian workers to arrive at the same time, Hou’s camp continues to present a false narrative of the nature of the deal. His campaign is trying to cast the Indian workers in a bad light, scare Taiwanese and add stress to the otherwise friendly ties between Taiwan and India.
It has been 32 years since Taiwan opened its doors to migrant workers, with the total number reaching about 750,000. Although the government’s policy has not kept pace with the times, and the old-fashioned laws and regulations are highly criticized, the government has never had the power to tell Taiwanese employers which foreign workers to employ, and it is certainly not able to designate which countries they should come from.
The claim that the policy would lead to 100,000 Indian workers arriving in Taiwan in one fell swoop is therefore quite absurd.
Look at a similar situation: the opening up to Vietnamese workers more than 20 years ago. Even with Hanoi’s annual quota for workers in Taiwan, it took more than a decade for the total number of Vietnamese workers to reach 100,000.
Therefore, Hou’s claim of 100,000 Indian workers immediately coming to work in Taiwan proves that his team is incapable of putting forward an effective policy on foreign labor, and that they are using the rumor to confuse the public and scare voters.
In addition to smearing the Ministry of Labor for seeking new sources of migrant workers, Hou has proposed restarting the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement with China, which would allow Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan.
That is even more worrying. The restart of negotiations on the service trade pact and the idea of signing such an agreement would allow Chinese families to move to Taiwan as “investment immigrants” for as little as US$200,000. With China’s current economic strength, it would not be too difficult to send millions of people to Taiwan.
If the government opens Taiwan up to low-paid Chinese workers as investment immigrants, migrant workers from other countries would find it difficult to compete with them in every industry.
Moreover, allowing Chinese students to study and work in Taiwan would affect employment opportunities for young Taiwanese. This issue should indeed be taken seriously.
Steve Kuan is a former chairman of the Taipei and New Taipei City employment service institute associations.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS