In the second televised presidential debate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, said that the “sacred mountain protecting the nation” (護國神山) in cross-strait relations is the “Republic of China [ROC] Constitution.”
Hou also vowed to apply the so-called “1922 consensus” to cross-strait issues. He wants to use the Constitution to buttress the “1992 consensus” and parrot China’s line of calling the “consensus” the “anchor” of cross-strait relations.
Hou and his running mate, Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), have decided to follow in former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) footsteps, doing and saying anything to please the Chinese government. From recognizing the “1992 consensus” and the “one China” principle, opposing Taiwanese independence, proposing to restart talks on the cross-strait service trade agreement, allowing students from China to work while studying in Taiwan, refusing to internationalize cross-strait economy and trade, and abolishing the conscription reform program, all of these policies have been nothing but actions to please Beijing, while the Constitution is used to cover up for their brazen, shameless agenda. Nevertheless, Hou seems to be missing several fundamental issues.
First, China has been sparing no effort to entice Taiwan to walk into the “one China” trap, so that when Taipei and Beijing both claim that “we are ‘one China’ pivoting toward unification,” the international community would lose its interest in China’s threat against Taiwan or even refrain from exercising measures to prevent Beijing from annexing the nation.
Hou seems to ignore that the majority of Taiwanese reject the “1992 consensus” and that its acceptance puts Taiwan in great jeopardy. In the unification agenda laid out by China, there has never been space for the ROC or Taiwan, or the precious democracy that our predecessors fought for. The “1992 consensus” is the “uncanny valley” tailor-made for Taiwan. Is Hou aware of the significance of his endorsement and how it could affect national interests, or is he merely being manipulated by deep-blue and pro-China supporters?
Second, as Hou said that the ROC Constitution is the “sacred mountain protecting the nation,” his “mentor” Ma had already quoted the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China during his visit to China.
Despite being a former president, Ma made the ludicrous remark: “Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, has never been a country and can never become a country.”
It is a pity that Ma has sunk so low, but it is even more baffling why Hou would want to adopt his stance.
If the Constitution is the “sacred mountain protecting the nation” in Hou’s mind, should not he, to use his favorite phrase, “completely clamp down on” those traitors that auction off our national sovereignty and send the wrong message to the world?
Last, Hou said that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) Taiwanese independence stance is an insurmountable barrier lying in front of cross-strait stability. Who does he exactly have in mind for being the culprit of sabotaging peace and warmongering? The DPP or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
China’s military aggression against Taiwan, or the entire Indo-pacific region, has been acknowledged by the international community as a major source of threat.
The only party that has been undermining peace is China, while the KMT only sings to the CCP’s tune and does not utter a word of protest, and even urges Taiwanese not to fight for their independence, not to strengthen ties with the US or support the DPP’s national defense mentality.
If there is an insurmountable barrier, it is nothing but China’s autocratic rule and contempt of democracy as well as the KMT’s obsequiousness to the CCP that are undermining cross-strait peace. If a presidential candidate cannot tell who is the real culprit threatening cross-strait peace and regional security, how do we expect such a candidate to safeguard our democracy and freedom?
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Rita Wang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS