In the second televised presidential debate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, said that the “sacred mountain protecting the nation” (護國神山) in cross-strait relations is the “Republic of China [ROC] Constitution.”
Hou also vowed to apply the so-called “1922 consensus” to cross-strait issues. He wants to use the Constitution to buttress the “1992 consensus” and parrot China’s line of calling the “consensus” the “anchor” of cross-strait relations.
Hou and his running mate, Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), have decided to follow in former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) footsteps, doing and saying anything to please the Chinese government. From recognizing the “1992 consensus” and the “one China” principle, opposing Taiwanese independence, proposing to restart talks on the cross-strait service trade agreement, allowing students from China to work while studying in Taiwan, refusing to internationalize cross-strait economy and trade, and abolishing the conscription reform program, all of these policies have been nothing but actions to please Beijing, while the Constitution is used to cover up for their brazen, shameless agenda. Nevertheless, Hou seems to be missing several fundamental issues.
First, China has been sparing no effort to entice Taiwan to walk into the “one China” trap, so that when Taipei and Beijing both claim that “we are ‘one China’ pivoting toward unification,” the international community would lose its interest in China’s threat against Taiwan or even refrain from exercising measures to prevent Beijing from annexing the nation.
Hou seems to ignore that the majority of Taiwanese reject the “1992 consensus” and that its acceptance puts Taiwan in great jeopardy. In the unification agenda laid out by China, there has never been space for the ROC or Taiwan, or the precious democracy that our predecessors fought for. The “1992 consensus” is the “uncanny valley” tailor-made for Taiwan. Is Hou aware of the significance of his endorsement and how it could affect national interests, or is he merely being manipulated by deep-blue and pro-China supporters?
Second, as Hou said that the ROC Constitution is the “sacred mountain protecting the nation,” his “mentor” Ma had already quoted the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China during his visit to China.
Despite being a former president, Ma made the ludicrous remark: “Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, has never been a country and can never become a country.”
It is a pity that Ma has sunk so low, but it is even more baffling why Hou would want to adopt his stance.
If the Constitution is the “sacred mountain protecting the nation” in Hou’s mind, should not he, to use his favorite phrase, “completely clamp down on” those traitors that auction off our national sovereignty and send the wrong message to the world?
Last, Hou said that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) Taiwanese independence stance is an insurmountable barrier lying in front of cross-strait stability. Who does he exactly have in mind for being the culprit of sabotaging peace and warmongering? The DPP or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
China’s military aggression against Taiwan, or the entire Indo-pacific region, has been acknowledged by the international community as a major source of threat.
The only party that has been undermining peace is China, while the KMT only sings to the CCP’s tune and does not utter a word of protest, and even urges Taiwanese not to fight for their independence, not to strengthen ties with the US or support the DPP’s national defense mentality.
If there is an insurmountable barrier, it is nothing but China’s autocratic rule and contempt of democracy as well as the KMT’s obsequiousness to the CCP that are undermining cross-strait peace. If a presidential candidate cannot tell who is the real culprit threatening cross-strait peace and regional security, how do we expect such a candidate to safeguard our democracy and freedom?
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Rita Wang
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS