Hackneyed insults unwanted
Not long ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential and vice presidential candidates, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), were interviewed by KMT Taipei City Councilor Chung Pei-chun (鍾沛君). When defending Hou during the interview, Jaw was a little too excited and went so far as to say that “People in the south [of Taiwan] are straightforward, so children having an argument might get into a [physical] fight easily when being inflamed by others. Taipei people like to argue while people in the south like to fight. Really!”
Such a statement is controversial.
I can only sigh: Jaw is doing it again. He is either agitating the ancestral origin sentiment or provoking ethnic and regional confrontation. When running for Taipei mayor as the New Party’s candidate in 1994, Jaw and his camp said that if Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayoral candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were elected, he might immediately force all Chinese mainlanders in Taiwan to jump into the Tamsui River (淡水河).
Jaw once even claimed that if the DPP gained power, the Republic of China was likely to perish. Such claims, of course, were absurd. Surprisingly, three decades later, he is still up to his same old tricks.
In comparison, Taiwanese entertainer Rainie Yang (楊丞琳) recently joked at a show that people from China’s Henan Province like to cheat, and was strongly pressured online by Chinese people to publicly apologize. As a candidate for Taiwan’s “alternate” head of state, should Jaw not issue a public apology for causing a confrontation between the north and the south of the country?
I am not saying that Jaw’s speech should be censored, nor am I encouraging people to criticize him on social media. He must have heard a lot of complaints by now, and should at least try to look back on his own behavior. We are living in the 21st century — does he really want to play this kind of unclassy and distasteful campaign trick in today’s social atmosphere? If the vice presidential candidate wants to lose more votes, then he should just continue what he is doing.
Victor Hung
Taichung
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past