Ratings agency Moody’s Investors Service on Tuesday last week cut its outlook for China’s credit rating to “negative” from “stable,” citing risks from a slowing economy, increasing local government debts and a continued slump in the Chinese property market. Wasting little time, the agency on Wednesday also downgraded its credit outlooks for Hong Kong and Macau to “negative” from “stable,” citing the territories’ tight political, institutional, economic and financial linkages with China.
While Moody’s reaffirmed its “A1” sovereign rating for China, the outlook downgrade was its first for the country since 2017, reflecting the agency’s pessimistic view of China’s mounting debts and the effects on its economic prospects.
Moody’s lowered its economic growth forecasts of the world’s second-largest economy for next year and 2025 to 4 percent, compared with the Chinese government’s annual growth target of about 5 percent for this year. The agency also put its average growth estimate for China at about 3.8 percent by 2030, implying a similarly pessimistic outlook for the Chinese economy in the long term.
The assessment was consistent with Moody’s previous credit risk judgements and followed the same treatment it gave the US on Nov. 10. At that time, Moody’s lowered its outlook on the US’ credit rating to “negative” from “stable,” citing the continuous accumulation of US federal debts and a decline in Washington’s stability of debt repayment amid growing political polarization.
Moody’s shift in stance on China’s credit outlook has much to do with the country’s real-estate problems, which have not only triggered debt defaults by major property developers including Evergrande Group and Country Garden Holdings Co, but also delivered knock-on effects on local government debts and the national economy as a whole. On Sept. 14, the agency revised its outlook for China’s property sector to “negative” from “stable” and said it expected the market’s downside to continue over the next six to 12 months.
Fitch Ratings and S&P have not adjusted their credit outlooks for China yet, but they have issued warnings on the rising risks associated with the nation’s property market and are not optimistic about the economy’s growth momentum. That is because the property sector and related industries make up a quarter of China’s economic activity, they said.
Fitch last month forecast an up to 5 percent decline in China’s new home sales next year following an estimated contraction of 10 to 15 percent this year, amid sustained declines in transaction volumes and re-emerging pressure on home prices, while S&P on Oct. 24 said that in its worst-case scenario, China’s real GDP growth could drop to 2.9 percent next year if the property slump worsens.
In other words, the three major agencies all have similar views on China’s economic growth and property market trends, and they only differ on how badly the property woes could evolve to affect other key business sectors including capital goods, consumer products and banks, and China’s overall economy.
Given that Taiwanese banks and insurance companies have continued to slash their exposure to China to the lowest level in at least a decade, the Financial Supervisory Commission last week said the Moody’s downgrade had little effect on Taiwanese banks and insurers, as it claimed a combined exposure of NT$23.6 billion (US$752.22 million) to Chinese bonds as of the end of last month.
However, local financial institutions still have to pay extra attention to China’s property crisis and its local government debt problem, which are not likely to be solved in the short term. Instead, they need to be improved through structural reforms in the long term. It also requires Beijing to adopt broader macroeconomic policies to promote sustained economic growth.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS