Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor and India’s Ministry of External Affairs have confirmed that the two countries plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) this month on recruiting Indians to work in Taiwan. While this marks another step in deepening ties between the two nations, it has also stirred debate, as misunderstandings and disinformation about the plan abound.
Taiwan is grappling with a shortage of workers due to a low birthrate and a society that is projected to turn super-aged by 2025. Official statistics show that Taiwan has a labor shortfall of at least 60,000 to 80,000, which is expected to widen to more than 400,000 within six years. Opening the nation to workers from India is one solution to addressing this problem. It would also help deepen economic and other non-diplomatic relations with India — the world’s most populous country and the fifth-largest economy, with its GDP forecast to grow 6.4 to 7 percent this year.
However, the MOU negotiations have sparked debate, as evidenced by a small-scale rally against the plan on Sunday. One major piece of misinformation spreading on social media claims that the government plans to bring in 100,000 Indian workers, threatening national security and increasing the crime rate. The Ministry of Labor has dismissed the figure, saying that the MOU is still under negotiation and that details would be discussed after it is signed.
Statistics show that while there are 18 million Indian workers employed worldwide, including in Singapore, the US and the Middle East, the crime rate involving Indian workers is lower than that among local citizens. For instance, data released by the Singapore Police Force for 2019 showed a crime rate of 227 per 100,000 Indian workers, compared with 435 per 100,000 among Singaporeans. In Taiwan, National Police Agency data showed that last year the crime rate among migrant workers was 59.46 cases per 100,000 people, lower than the 114.12 per 100,000 among Taiwanese.
The National Security Bureau and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have also warned about messages from thousands of abnormal or fake accounts and disseminated by some Chinese media accounts to manipulate public opinion on this issue. These are part of cognitive warfare employed by foreign forces, such as China, to harm Taiwan’s international image and cause tensions between Taipei and New Delhi.
Since the amendment of the Employment Services Act (就業服務法) in 1992, Taiwan has opened its doors to migrant workers. There are currently more than 750,000 migrant workers in Taiwan, with the majority from Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. There are also 2,700 Indian professionals employed in the high-tech and financial sectors.
While the unemployment rate in Taiwan has dropped to a 23-year low and the average annual wage has risen to an eight-year high, migrant workers have played an important role, especially in filling jobs that Taiwanese might not be interested in doing.
As the Indian government has recently signed employment agreements with at least 13 countries, including Japan, France and the UK, a Taiwan-India job pact could provide Taiwan with one more option for skilled and multilingual workers.
The government could start with small-scale recruitment of workers for target industries, on the one hand creating more mutual understanding between people in the two countries while, on the other, accumulating experience to establish more supporting measures to make Indian workers key partners in Taiwan’s national development.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS