As China-founded e-commerce behemoth Shein moves to list in New York, US lawmakers are again calling on it to prove that forced labor is not used to make its US$5 T-shirts and US$10 sweaters.
Shein confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) on Monday and could launch sales of its shares some time next year. The Singapore-based company has not determined the size of the deal or the valuation at IPO. Bloomberg last month reported that it targeted up to US$90 billion in the float.
Founded in 2012, Shein has been eyeing a US IPO for at least three years but has been deterred by headwinds that included tensions between Beijing and Washington.
The online fast-fashion retailer, which manufactures most of its merchandise in China, faces criticism that Uighur forced labor is used to make its low-priced apparel and home goods.
Critics are concerned that Shein might use contract manufacturers in China’s Xinjiang region, where advocates and governments have accused China of interning Uighurs and other largely Muslim minority groups. Beijing denies any abuses.
Convincing regulators that its supply chain is clean would likely be a major regulatory hurdle as Shein works to convince the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that its shares should be traded publicly.
“If the fast-fashion giant Shein wants to go public in the US, they should have to prove to American consumers that their products are not sourced from forced labor,” Democratic US Representative Jennifer Wexton said in a statement on Tuesday.
The congresswoman earlier this year led a bipartisan call for the SEC to halt Shein’s IPO until it verifies that the company does not use forced labor within its supply chain.
A separate group of Republican attorneys general from 16 US states has also asked the SEC to audit the company, and Shein has been investigated by two separate congressional committees over its sourcing and use of a trade loophole that allows most of its products to enter the US duty free.
A spokesperson for Shein in a statement on Tuesday said the company has a zero-tolerance policy for forced labor and was “eager to engage and continue to be transparent with all stakeholders, including Representative Wexton and her staff.”
Shein has previously told Reuters it has no contract manufacturers in Xinjiang.
A spokesperson for the SEC said the agency does not comment on any individual entity’s filings.
Megan Penick, a public securities lawyer at Michelman & Robinson, said it is unlikely to see a “direct block” from the SEC, but the agency could make the process difficult for Shein by making “the disclosure requirements so detailed, and, perhaps extreme, that it makes it seem ... trying to go public cannot be achieved.”
“There may be issues with the forced labor allegations and the IP [intellectual property] issues that may make it hard for [Shein] to be able to answer the questions to the satisfaction of the SEC,” Penick said.
Public disclosures show that Shein has spent US$1.28 million on US Capitol Hill lobbying this year as it prepares to go public.
The company has also met privately with lawmakers, including some of its biggest critics, in an effort to shift its reputation in Washington, several congressional aides said.
One source familiar with the matter said that representatives for Shein emphasized the retailer’s efforts to diversify its supply chain from China to other countries, including India.
Shein also touted its efforts to bring more China-made goods to the US in bulk on traditional container ships, which requires paying tariffs on those items.
“Shein is fundamentally a Chinese company and investors should approach Chinese offerings with extreme caution. Its attempt to go public should prompt a closer look at its business practices, especially its links to slave labor and its evasion of US customs laws,” Republican US Senator Marco Rubio said.
“I will closely monitor Shein’s disclosures in the lead-up to its IPO,” added Rubio, who in June criticized the retailer’s lobbying efforts in a letter distributed to other senators.
Republican US Representative Chris Smith, chairman of the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China, has also criticized Shein’s lobbying efforts.
“Any investor in this company should be wary of the material risks involved in Shein’s business model ... particularly as Congress is demanding an end to forced labor and closure of import subsidies for Chinese companies,” Smith said.
In its most recent social impact report, Shein highlighted its partnership with Oritain, a company also used by the US government to test cotton for links to China’s Xinjiang region.
Oritain chief executive officer Grant Cochrane on Tuesday said that the testing company conducted 2,762 tests of Shein yarn, fabric and finished products from August last year to last month, and that 1.7 percent tested positive for cotton from unapproved regions. The average prevalence of cotton from unapproved regions among brands that work with Oritain was 6 percent this year, the company said.
Critics, however, say that the testing does not adequately screen the millions of garments exported globally by Shein every year.
The SEC’s handling of Shein’s IPO would be crucial for other e-commerce players including ByteDance’s TikTok and PDD Group’s Temu, which might consider going public in the US, Penick said.
Shein’s IPO is “going to be raising issues [for the SEC] that may later be applied across the board to all China-based or China-related companies that are going public,” Penick said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS