It has been suggested that Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, is certain to win the presidency now that the “blue-white alliance” plan has fallen apart.
Lai had been polling in first place with a healthy margin separating him from the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). Expectations were that he would win handily unless his opponents pooled their resources.
Now that the three candidates are in their respective corners, the gloves are likely to come off. Lai needs to put up his guard and prepare to parry the inevitable blows.
A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation poll released on Monday showed that Lai might already be in trouble, with Ko’s approval rating of 31.9 percent overtaking Lai’s 29.2 percent. Hou still trailed at 23.6 percent.
While this is the first time Ko has taken the lead, three things should be noted:
First, the foundation’s findings are contradicted by polls released by online news firm my-formosa.com, TVBS and a third by World United Formosans for Independence and the Taiwan National Security Association. They showed Lai in the lead, but the former two had Ko in third and the latter had him second, albeit only marginally ahead of Hou.
Second, the foundation’s poll was conducted before the alliance talks fell through, when it still appeared as if Ko was giving the establishment KMT a run for its money.
Third, the variable results of the four polls demonstrate just how unpredictable this campaign season is. The KMT and the TPP wasted time arguing about the prospective alliance, but now they will be turning their sights on their rivals.
Given the animosity between Ko and the KMT after the debacle of the alliance negotiations, it is possible that they will tear into each other. A wiser plan would be for them to rein in their mutual distaste and concentrate on criticizing the government’s record and leveraging voters’ fear of a potential military conflict.
Hou and the KMT need to worry about the foundation’s findings, which suggest that Ko’s support comes mostly from supporters of the KMT, not the DPP.
They also need to be concerned about tactical voting: An “anti-green coalition” might manifest in a way that the KMT and its chairman, Eric Chu (朱立倫), did not foresee.
It has long been apparent that the TPP has been eating the KMT’s lunch in terms of voter support, getting proportionately more of its support from the blue end of the spectrum. If KMT voters wanting a change of government see Ko pulling convincingly ahead of Hou, they might jump ship and go over to the TPP to improve their chances of ousting the DPP.
Of course, it could go the other way, with TPP supporters abandoning Ko in favor of Hou if the latter’s polling improves.
Given that most polls so far have placed Hou in third, Lai faces a difficult balancing act. He could take aim at Ko and the TPP, with the party having a distinct advantage over the DPP among voters who are young, educated, Hakka, elderly white-collar, grassroots white-collar, members of the military or civil servants, self-employed or owners of small or medium-sized enterprises, or students.
On the other hand, he does not want Ko to fall too far behind Hou, because he wants to avoid tactical voting among anti-green voters. It benefits him to keep this election a three-horse race.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises