The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) had engaged in weeks of political horse-trading between high-ranking officials, hoping to form a joint ticket to win January’s presidential election, but it all ended in a dramatic public falling out on live television on Thursday.
The farcical performance involving mudslinging and quarrels among three men — the TPP’s candidate and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), the KMT’s candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), an independent — and their aides in the evening before the official candidate registration deadline on Friday marked the theatrical finale of the “blue-white alliance” for the election.
After many people watched the meeting with a mix of disbelief and amusement, its five main participants — the three candidates, along with KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — were ridiculed on the Internet as “five men with their nonsense” (五漢廢言), a play on the Chinese phrase “Wuhan pneumonia,” a name used for COVID-19 in the early phase of the pandemic. Ko on Friday also said the meeting had turned out to be a “farce.”
Consequently, the Jan. 13 election has been settled as a three-way race between Hou, Ko and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) after Gou dropped out a few hours before the registration deadline.
The three-way race is widely believed to provide a boost for Lai, as he has been leading in opinion polls throughout the year, and the KMT and the TPP had just failed to realize their long-held hope of combining their support to defeat Lai and unseat the DPP.
With fewer than 50 days to the election, it will undoubtedly be an uphill battle for the two opposition parties, as they just named their vice-presidential candidates on Friday morning — Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) as Hou’s running mate and TPP Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) as Ko’s — after they settled on separate campaigns.
DPP lawmakers also seized the opportunity to ask voters to carefully consider if the KMT and TPP leaders — who tried to outwit each other, quarreled over polling results, spent critical hours debating trivial matters and ended in a dramatic breakup — are capable of formulating national policies, protecting Taiwan’s interests and negotiating fairly as equals with China or other nations.
While the answer seems obvious, it still might not be as “easy” a win for Lai and his running mate — former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) — as many disappointed pan-blue supporters believe.
China has a long history of using multifaceted methods to meddle in Taiwan’s elections, including spreading disinformation, economic coercion and military threats, all aimed to influence Taiwanese to vote for a “China-friendly” government and move closer to its ultimate goal of unification.
With the KMT and TPP, which seek closer China ties, having failed to form a joint ticket, it is likely that Beijing would ramp up its efforts to interfere in Taiwan’s election process. Its Taiwan Affairs Office last week already called the Lai-Hsiao ticket a “combination of two separatists,” that “Taiwan independence” means war and that Taiwanese should think about what a DPP president would mean for their future.
There is still time for voters to shift their support based on how the three campaigns present themselves, as well as Chinese interference. So there is no guaranteed win for any party. Taiwanese must keep their eyes open and vote wisely.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS