Washington’s unwavering support for Israel during its ground invasion of Gaza is coming under increasing scrutiny in the Global South.
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) this week hosted a delegation of foreign ministers from the Arab and Islamic world, including representatives from Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Egypt and Indonesia. Beijing said it is ready to work with these countries toward a ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid and an “early, comprehensive, just and enduring settlement of the Palestinian question.”
This is not a new line from Beijing, but it would no doubt be welcomed by some in the Muslim world, particularly in Southeast Asia, which is keen to see more global leadership on an issue that has stoked outrage across communities. Tensions have been running high since Oct. 7, when Hamas militants surged across the border and killed 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, and took as many as 240 hostage.
The region’s two largest Muslim majority countries — Indonesia and Malaysia — have long taken a strong pro-Palestinian stance and neither has diplomatic ties with Israel. As the civilian death toll in Gaza climbed above 13,000 following Israel’s military campaign, with images of dead and injured children flooding their timelines, tens of thousands of Indonesians and Malaysians have attended rallies and sermons in support of Palestinians.
The protest movement is spreading to all areas of public life in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, where 87 percent of the 280 million strong population follow the faith. In a social media video message to his followers on Monday last week, Asrorun Niam Sholeh, chairman of the Fatwa Division at the Indonesian Ulema Council, the highest Muslim authority in the land, laid out the four principles behind an edict that urged the faithful to boycott Israeli products.
There have also been social media lists encouraging people to avoid well-known US brands such as McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, Starbucks and Coca-Cola. Those protesting say the double standards of the US in the Middle East are becoming increasingly apparent.
It is a similar picture in Malaysia. At a rally in Kuala Lumpur on Oct. 24, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim joined thousands of pro-Palestinian supporters to condemn what they are calling “barbaric” acts in Gaza. The country has refused to cut ties with Hamas, and Anwar has spoken to Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh to express “Malaysia’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people.” In parliament, the Malaysian prime minister said the US embassy had tried to pressure him to change his mind, but he refused.
“Popular opinion in Malaysia is causing leaders to speak out forcefully,” said Sidney Jones, the New York-based senior adviser to the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict in Jakarta. “In Indonesia, there is no way that President Joko Widodo could have met with President Joe Biden recently and not said he had delivered a message about Gaza to the US.”
This has yet to cause a serious rift between the US and Indonesia — the two countries signed a comprehensive strategic partnership at that same meeting — although if Indonesians volunteering in hospitals in Gaza are killed, it could prompt more representations from Jakarta to Washington, she said.
The pressure is already rising. Indonesian Minister for Foreign Affairs Retno Marsudi, in a video message from the foreign ministers’ meeting in Beijing, “strongly condemned” what she said were Israeli tank attacks on the Indonesian hospital in Gaza on Monday, in which it is thought 12 civilians were killed.
Israel said the medical facility is used to disguise Hamas’ underground command and control center, a claim both the Indonesians and the Palestinians deny.
This is just one example of how the conflict is spilling over into Southeast Asia. Washington’s unquestioning support for Israel is contentious in the region, dean of Nanyang Technological University’s College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Joseph Liow (廖振揚) said. Much of this is a hangover from the aftermath of al-Qaeda’s attacks on the US on 9/11 — in particular the US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan — that is still fresh in the minds of many Malaysians and Indonesians.
“That script is going to play out again, and that is going to create difficulties for the leaders of these countries,” he said.
Enter China, which has been quick to spot the opportunity to play global peacemaker, despite its many limitations. Beijing has been trying to position itself as a powerful player in the Middle East, after it helped broker a detente between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The US has urged China to use its influence to prevent the conflict from spreading further, but President Xi Jinping (習近平) has yet to use the leverage he has with Russia and Iran to influence either the war in Ukraine or Gaza. Even now, as more nations in the Arab and Islamic world are turning to Beijing, it has little more to offer besides commitments to keep talking.
The Chinese are likely to continue their relationship-building with the Islamic world on the Palestinian issue, overtures that are likely to be welcomed, despite Beijing’s mass arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances against Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang. Human Rights Watch in 2021 concluded that these violations constituted “crimes against humanity.” Yet the focus for many Muslims in Asia is the fate of their fellow Muslims in the Middle East, not in Xinjiang.
Comments by Biden warning Israel about extremist violence against Palestinians in the West Bank might do little to win over those suspicious of US intentions. The question now is whether Beijing could bridge the gap between its diplomatic ambitions and its ability.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS