Last Saturday, a large crowd, many waving rainbow flags and dressed in flamboyant costumes and clothing, marched through Taipei in a raucous celebration of LGBTQ+ equality and diversity in East Asia’s largest Pride march.
This year’s parade was aimed at “recognizing the diversity of every person, and respecting and accepting different gender identities,” said the Taiwan Rainbow Civil Association, the event’s organizer.
People might wonder why there is still a need to hold a march every year since Taiwan already became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in 2019.
The reason is fairly simple: People are forgetful creatures. Any advancement or reform could easily backslide in a democratic society if left “unattended.”
A case in point is when the US Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states during former US president Barack Obama’s administration. People thought things were looking up for LGBTQ+ Americans, yet things took a dark turn when Donald Trump was elected US president. Trump introduced new policies unfriendly to LGBTQ+ people and reversed nearly every policy Obama had implemented.
To prevent such a relapse in Taiwan, the annual parade serves as a reminder that rights of equality and inclusion are hard-earned achievements.
After same-sex marriage between citizens became legal in Taiwan, society has taken a step further in understanding LGBTQ+ Taiwanese, yet there are still many aspects that leave much to be desired. For one, media outlets tend to vilify the costumes of people in the Pride parade. There are still stereotypes, false impressions and bias aimed at them, such as a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) city councilor blaming the declining birthrate on same-sex marriages or how LGBTQ+ people undermine or go against traditional cultural practices of filial piety.
The annual pride is held with the aim of reducing bigotry and stereotypes. What matters is that different groups “agree to disagree” after communication and find a way forward together instead of letting misunderstandings and ill will get in the way.
As the nation gears up for the Jan. 13 presidential and legislative elections, gender or sexuality-based attacks on candidates could also rise. Infamous examples include the KMT accusing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of being a “lesbian” or former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) calling on Tsai to clarify her sexual orientation.
So far, only a few non-heterosexual candidates have been elected as representatives, which shows how hard it is for LGBTQ+ people to participate in the current political environment. Political parties should encourage more LGBTQ+ candidates to participate in politics to promote gender equality, and offer an open platform for LGBTQ+ people and discussion of anti-bigotry issues.
It is worth mentioning that out of the four presidential candidates, only the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), attended the parade. The other three candidates all gave reasons for their absence, but when it comes to politics, there is no such thing as “excuses,” there is only an endorsement or not.
Pride is more than just an event that celebrates diversity, respect and inclusion — it is also a representation of Taiwan’s openness and equality. The public cannot afford to forget that same-sex marriage is the achievement of people’s collective efforts, toil and daring. It is up to the public to make the right choice for the presidency next year so as to keep that invaluable right alive for the next four years.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS