Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has come under fire amid reports that the party has selected Xu Chunying (徐春鶯), a Chinese immigrant and an advocate for foreign-born spouses, who was allegedly a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cadre, for its list of legislator-at-large nominees.
To justify his selection, Ko said that as more than 1 million Taiwanese residents have links to Chinese spouses, they have a right to be represented and should not be treated like enemies.
However, Ko’s nomination would throw Chinese spouses in Taiwan in greater fear.
As a former CCP cadre, Xu would have had close connections with the Chinese government and the CCP. Add the fact that she has maintained frequent contacts with Chinese political organizations.
If Xu invites or visits any Chinese spouses, asking them to join her organization — the New Residents Development Association — they would not dare turn down her invitation or reject assigned tasks. This is out of fear that they have no idea if Xu has the CCP’s backing or not. Chinese who have immigrated to Taiwan might fear for their families’ safety in China, worried that their families might be in danger if they refuse to comply with Xu’s orders.
Chinese spouses who came to Taiwan seeking love and starting a new family here are also looking for a way out, away from China’s clutches. Xu’s actions and potential rise to further power would only send their lives into disarray and render their efforts to escape China futile.
Ko nominating Xu is aimed at not only commandeering the support of families with Chinese spouses, but also sending a message to China that Ko is more capable than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of proposing policies that cater to the CCP’s interests.
By doing this, he is soliciting China’s support to back him in the “blue-white alliance” and see him as the leader of the anti-Democratic Progress Party coalition.
As another party with the same agenda in mind would also be vying for these ballots, these sycophantic moves could undermine national security, putting Taiwan in grave danger amid rising tensions across the Taiwan Strait.
As Ko and the TPP are only seeking their own interests instead of bringing benefit to people or thinking of national welfare, Taiwanese should not hand the presidency to such a character in next year’s election.
Lin Shiou-jeng is chair of Chung Chou University of Science and Technology’s marketing and logistics management department.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS