The presidential election is only three months away. Yet as of now, only Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has a clear campaign as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate. Other candidates, including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), as an independent, are still struggling to form an alliance among themselves.
Be it a Hou-Ko, Ko-Hou, Gou-Ko or Ko-Gou ticket, the disagreements between the blue and white camps have adversely affected the presidential election. When the politicians of those two camps negotiate with one another, they rarely address issues regarding national policy. Each of the presidential candidates should have already laid out his political agendas clearly for the voters, but none of these three have done so.
In this sense, did Ko propose a coalition for the greater good or only for his political interests? Would this “coalition” be able to play a role in supervising all political parties, or would it be an excuse for the politicians to blame one another to the detriment of Taiwan?
Since the beginning of his campaign, the agreement that the blue and the white camps have reached is to “oust the DPP” and achieve a transfer of political power. Of course, from the perspective of an opposition party, it is reasonable that these two slogans are used for their campaigns, and it is appropriate for them to do so. Yet when the blue and white camps are using this to gain momentum for their collaboration, they not only show how shallow and impotent they are, but also suggest they only care about their political interests.
First, to put things into context, the KMT is a century-old political party. To obtain power and political control, the KMT would defend politicians related to its own local factions, such as Miaoli County Commissioner Chung Tung-chin (鍾東錦) and KMT Legislator Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), despite these local politicians often being mired in controversy. On the other hand, the TPP has been branding itself as a new political force, claiming that it would be able to surpass the blue and green camps and offer voters an alternative.
If the KMT and the TPP are to collaborate, the burning question is not about who should be the presidential candidate and who should be his deputy, but how those controversial political figures are to be dealt with.
Second, whenever the blue-white alliance has been discussed, we have seen those politicians attack and criticize one another. After their first meeting, some political agendas in a statement were marked as ideas the TPP was against, indicating that they had no intention of reaching a consensus among themselves.
Moreover, these politicians argued with each other about whether to use polls or a primary to determine who should be the presidential candidate. Each of them wants to employ the means most favorable to himself, and tends to blame others for the failure to form an alliance. Ko even said: “The only thing that the KMT wants to do is to get rid of me.” How could these people really work out something constructive?
Lastly, the blue and white camps are thinking about how to elevate their own status rather than focusing on Taiwan’s future. From the moment both sides started talking about collaboration, neither camp has discussed much about their political agendas and policy. Worse, even before they reach a compromise, they talk about which “position” one should take. For instance, Ko once said that he would not take everything, given that the KMT is still a larger party than the TPP. TVBS political talk show host Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) also said that the KMT should have the right to form the Cabinet, but that the TPP could decide who would head at least five of the ministries. Clearly, what occupies their minds are the official positions and political interests rather than Taiwan’s future.
Governing a country requires a lot of work. Everyone should work together in solidarity to ensure the operation of the government. The opposition party also plays an important role in overseeing the government, and this is especially important for a democratic country’s political system. Yet, an opposition party could indeed harm Taiwan, as demonstrated by the cases of KMT legislators Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) and Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷).
A few years ago, during the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the governing party did not have a legislative majority, and as a result, was unable to pass the defense budget it was seeking. Today, while the negotiation between the blue and white camp is still ongoing, each party has started blaming the other and shirking their duties. It is highly doubtful whether a coalition between them would work. Such a government might become one only capable of shirking responsibilities and constantly running on empty.
Tung Chien-hung is an associate professor at National Chung-Hsing University and president of the Central Taiwan Society.
Translated by Emma Liu
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS