On Sept. 28, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong press release expressing great regret and condemnation of the use of the Nazi flag by a few Taiwanese citizens. We write to express our support for the reasoning conveyed in the ministry’s statement.
Symbols matter deeply in our society. Visual language is powerful, influencing our thoughts and emotions subtly and profoundly. This is true when we use casual emojis in our texts and even more so when we see world-known trademarks and national symbols.
National symbols carry profound meanings and evoke deep emotions. They reflect the history, struggles, and values of people and communities. As such, they deserve respect and sensitivity from global citizens due to the weight of the narratives they carry.
The Nazi Swastika is a prime example, being one of the most recognizable modern symbols.
It stems from the darkest chapter of Germany history, where it served as the most significant and notorious of hate symbols, representing antisemitism and racial segregation, which lead to the persecution of Jews and other communities, and those with a different religious and sexual orientations.
Nazi Germany went so far as to set in motion the Final Solution — a genocide that involved mass murders.
The Swastika flag as the symbol of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler also stands for the horror of World War II during which about 60 million people died: about 20 million military personnel and 40 million civilians.
Against this background, the use of the symbols associated with the Nazi party, the swastika and the swastika flag, is still outlawed in Germany. Many other countries, too, have banned Nazi symbols: It is considered a criminal offense if they are displayed publicly for non-educational purposes.
The display of this deeply offensive Nazi symbol on large flags in the heart of Taipei city is therefore deeply troubling and offensive, not only because of the atrocities associated with this symbol to Jews and many other communities deemed undesirable by the Nazis, but also because it dangerously normalizes and integrates a symbol of hate into an accepted reality.
Israel, bearing the indelible scars of the Holocaust, understands intimately the pain and suffering that Nazi symbols inflict, as does Germany remembering its history. This symbol is not merely a twisted cross; it represents a regime that orchestrated the genocide of 6 million Jews and millions of others. Each time this symbol is presented, it tears open old wounds and revives memories of atrocities that should never be forgotten or trivialized.
Taiwan, a beacon of democracy and freedom in the Asia-Pacific region, has rightfully condemned the inappropriate use of a symbol steeped in hatred and discrimination.
It is true that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, but it is crucial to acknowledge the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the propagation of hate speech. The latter should never find shield or justification under the banner of free expression.
This is especially true when these offensive symbols are displayed in front of a school. Children are the most vulnerable members of our societies, they are strongly protected by law. It should be our common goal to shield them from malign influences and symbols of hate.
All nations and individuals bear the responsibility of weighing the impact of their words and actions on others, particularly when they harm or offend, as witnessed in this unfortunate event. Exercising democratic rights responsibly is an obligation that falls upon all of us.
The Taiwanese government has been a staunch advocate of human rights and freedoms, cohosting an annual event since 2016 to honor International Holocaust Remembrance Day alongside Israel and Germany. We are confident in Taiwan’s empathy, understanding and respect toward this important issue.
Now is an opportune time for Taiwan to act and foster an environment adhering to international norms and standards. In a world growing increasingly interconnected and interdependent, we should all collectively aspire for national symbols to serve as bridges of understanding, friendship and tolerance among us all, and avoid any symbols expressing the opposite. This prudent approach is even more important when uninformed and vulnerable children are exposed, as is the case in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) today.
Maya Yaron is Israel’s representative to Taiwan. Jorg Polster is director-general of the German Institute Taipei.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS