At 33, Taylor Swift is on her way to becoming the US’ youngest self-made female billionaire and one of the few magnate millennials who has not made her fortune from meme stocks and cryptocurrency.
Her Eras Tour concert film, released on Oct. 13, had advance sales of more than US$100 million, which was expected to double within weeks. The tour itself has already become the highest-grossing concert series of all time and is on track to generate up to US$4 billion from ticket sales alone.
Swift’s great wealth — made mostly off low and middle-income young Americans — brings great responsibility. For all of her marketing power, which has recently helped to boost NFL viewership (and, yeah, the whole US economy), she has yet to make a significant mark as a philanthropist.
In an era when “billionaire” has become synonymous with anti-heroes like Elon Musk, who has brought havoc into the digital public square formerly known as Twitter and shown little interest in channeling his wealth toward the betterment of society, we need a new model for extreme affluence in the US.
Swift might not be the lone artist-entrepreneur in the under-40 billionaire’s club, but she could be the first to boldly champion causes that would serve the interests of her Gen Z and millennial fanbase, including tax reform for the wealthiest Americans and climate change.
Sure, the singer-songwriter has a track record of generosity, making piecemeal donations in the tens of thousands to alleviate medical bills or personal financial stresses for one fan or family at a time. She has also contributed to cancer research and donated to food banks along the Eras Tour route.
Yet investing meaningfully in the priorities of her fans would look different, and the public should expect her to give back on an ambitious scale. Swift is well positioned to do this not just because she is a powerful lever of capitalism, but because of her role as an industry iconoclast. She has challenged misogyny, championed artists’ rights and helped shift the paradigm of intellectual property ownership. She has also helped to reinvent the traditional album release model and radically pushed the boundaries of fan engagement.
Going forward, Swift has two crucial opportunities to seize:
First, she should openly and proudly welcome US President Joe Biden’s proposed tax on the ultra-rich. “It’s time billionaires paid at least a 25 percent minimum tax,” Biden recently tweeted, echoing a plan he introduced last March.
The president’s proposal, which has been introduced in the US Congress last year as the “Billionaire Minimum Income Tax Act,” honors the sensibilities and economic realities of Swift’s young fanbase.
As a paragon of marketing and commercialism, Swift should bear in mind that more than half of Gen Z and millennials say they have a negative view of capitalism. Today, many in Swift’s age group are also struggling with unprecedented levels of student loan and credit card debt, even as many spend thousands on her concert tickets and merchandise.
The overall effective tax rate of the ultra-wealthy in the US has plummeted in recent decades. In 1970 it was 75 percent, in 2004 it was 35 percent, and it is 8.2 percent today. In that context, a 25 percent tax rate is a paltry ask. Welcoming Biden’s minimum tax rate would be on brand with Swift’s love of tradition and her progressive, patriotic “Miss Americana” profile.
Second, a somewhat larger challenge for Swift would be to acknowledge and begin to redress her profligate climate impact. It has been widely covered that her carbon footprint via her private jet last year alone was nearly 2,000 times the global average and about 650 times the per-capita emissions of the average US citizen. In response, Swift’s team has offered a bafflingly evasive statement saying she loaned her jet out to friends.
The Eras Tour has exponentially increased this impact — not just through the singer’s personal travel and that of her crew, but by the fans traveling to her events across 146 shows on five continents and indulging in a rash of conspicuous consumption. After the tour ends and the glitter is swept from the floor, this decadence could well backfire.
The superstar knows firsthand the pain of being canceled and has the power to avoid it.
She could start by disclosing a transparent analysis of the full carbon impact of her extended Eras Tour and a clear inventory of her efforts to reduce it. In August, a spokesperson for Swift told Business Insider that she purchased offsets for personal jet travel for the tour, but it was not independently verified, and her concert site mentions no climate strategy. Swift should commit to carbon-neutral touring, which goes well beyond personal air travel to include efficient stadium lighting, sustainable food vendors and limits on single-use plastics. Doing this would be far less painful than enduring public criticism for doing nothing.
This would be a first step toward the greater project of setting new standards for 21st-century US billionaires because it demonstrates what is possible when extraordinary personal success can benefit not just the individual but the multitudes.
After all, Swift’s wealth has been built by multitudes of young consumers. Investing in their future is not just the morally defensible path forward but an economically strategic one that would enable Swift to shake off the burdens of her profligacy.
Amanda Little is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering agriculture and climate. She is a professor at Vanderbilt University and author of The Fate of Food: What We’ll Eat in a Bigger, Hotter, Smarter World. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
Taiwan ranks second globally in terms of share of population with a higher-education degree, with about 60 percent of Taiwanese holding a post-secondary or graduate degree, a survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed. The findings are consistent with Ministry of the Interior data, which showed that as of the end of last year, 10.602 million Taiwanese had completed post-secondary education or higher. Among them, the number of women with graduate degrees was 786,000, an increase of 48.1 percent over the past decade and a faster rate of growth than among men. A highly educated population brings clear advantages.