High interest rates, geopolitical risks and skittish investors have created the worst year for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in a decade, but sports is one corner of the global investment market where deals just will not stop. From the proposed merger of the PGA and LIV golf tours to the US$6 billion acquisition of the Washington Commanders football team, billions in investment capital is finding its way onto the field of play.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc is among those ready to get in on the game. Last month, the bank announced a new “sports franchise” unit within its investment banking division. It should not have any problems finding business. In uncertain economic times, sports are turning out to be the resilient asset class that (very big) investors simply cannot pass up.
The deals are coming fast. In the past 10 months, they were highlighted by, among other transactions, the world’s largest professional wrestling and mixed-martial arts promoters merging to create a US$21 billion Goliath and Michael Jordan selling the Charlotte Hornets for US$3 billion. It is not just teams and leagues dealing. In the second quarter, the sports technology sector, which ranges over everything from gambling tech to wearables, saw more than 100 merger and acquisition deals, exceeding the volume and dollar amounts from the previous four quarters.
Investors should be interested: Few asset classes have appreciated as dramatically as sports franchises in recent years. From 2018 to this year, the combined value of Forbes’ analysis of the 50 most valuable sports franchises increased by 90 percent to US$256 billion.
Three factors drive that growth.
First, the rights to broadcast and stream live sports continue to grow in value. This year, the global value of the industry’s media rights reached US$55 billion, and one analyst expects it to hit US$65 billion in 2025.
Second, sports viewership has remained incredibly resilient, even after the COVID-19 pandemic forced the shutdown of live events. As just one example, early this season, the NFL is seeing some of its best television ratings in years (partly thanks to Taylor Swift). Likewise, the last English Premier League season had its best US viewership since 2015-16.
Third, scarcity and status drive demand. For example, there are only 30 NBA franchises, making the league one of the world’s most exclusive clubs. As the ranks of billionaires who can afford — and covet — a franchise grows, the number of teams remains static. When one goes on the market, the bidding is fierce and the ultimate selling price is high.
Many owners and investors believe that strategic mergers between teams and leagues can unlock even more value. Media rights, in particular, might benefit from a consolidated bid between teams or leagues. That was partly the theory behind the merger of World Wrestling Entertainment and Ultimate Fighting Championships. Both have lucrative media rights deals up for renewal in the next couple of years. Perhaps bankers and investors wonder if they can gain more by consolidating their offerings.
Likewise, other investors believe mergers can create efficiencies in everything from player scouting and development to marketing. In part, that is the reason why US-owned BlueCo, the owner of English soccer giant Chelsea FC, recently purchased RC Strasbourg Alsace, a top-tier French club. BlueCo, founded by private equity veterans, is not alone in seeing synergies. By one account, 180 clubs worldwide and 6,500 players were part of multi-club ownership groups, and the trend is growing.
As valuations rise, the days when an eccentric local sports fan with resources could buy and manage a team are fading away. Instead, the transactions require multiple partners, interests, complex financing, and financial and personal background checks. Those are among the reasons why the NBA, MLB and NHL have changed their ownership rules to allow stakes by private equity. The rule changes allow larger numbers of investors — motivated by growth or simply fandom — to get involved in what looks like the surest bet in mergers and acquisitions.
Goldman’s new sports franchise unit, formed at what might be the boom’s peak, is poised to take advantage.
Of course, sports could falter. Regulatory pressures, especially in Europe, could end multi-club ownership, undercutting business plans and investment. Likewise, media rights deals — the revenue stream upon which so many long-term sports investment strategies are built — could falter in the face of cord-cutting and the shift from traditional broadcasters to streamers. Will sports fans continue bankrolling big player salaries via increasingly expensive streaming subscriptions? The answers to that question might not be clear for several years, and by that time, it might be too late for investors who are buying now.
However, as the rest of the mergers and acquisitions universe falters, those are small, long-term concerns. With a proven record of prospering through economic downturns and even a pandemic, sports are the steady investment that the world’s biggest investors want in their corner.
Adam Minter is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the business of sports. He is the author, most recently, of Secondhand: Travels in the New Global Garage Sale. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS