On Oct. 3, police in New Delhi raided and searched the residences of several staff members of the NewsClick online news site and detained several of them for interrogation. According to an investigative report published in the New York Times in August under the headline “A global web of Chinese propaganda leads to a US tech mogul,” NewsClick’s main funder is a 69-year-old US citizen named Neville Roy Singham, who established the Chicago-based software and information technology consultancy Thoughtworks and currently lives in Shanghai.
NewsClick, founded in 2009, defines itself as an independent news medium focusing on “social justice” that speaks out for “oppressed communities.” However, the New York Times report says NewsClick’s reports are full of Chinese government talking points such as that “China’s history continues to inspire the working classes.” Many organizations, from the Massachusetts-based think tank Tricontinental and a South African political party to a Brazilian news organization, have traces of Singham’s funding with the aim of spreading China’s “grand external propaganda.” According to the report, Singham-funded media have used funding from the Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Shanghai Municipal Committee to publish videos on YouTube and “spread China’s voice to the world.”
As a longstanding enemy of China, India is extremely wary of Chinese infiltration. It is one of the most active countries with respect to blocking suspicious Chinese companies. Consequently, the safest and most effective way for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to spread its propaganda in India is through US citizens. During the CCP’s Yanan (延安) period — from 1935 to 1947, when it was based in Yanan in China’s Shaanxi Province — US reporters such as Edgar Snow, Agnes Smedley and Anna Louise Strong wrote propaganda favorable to the CCP, and they were followed later on by others such as Sidney Rittenberg. All these writers were a bunch of lefties. Given this history, it should be no surprise that the likes of Singham should appear, the only difference being that their sights are set on money.
On Oct. 4, several hundred Indian journalists gathered at the Press Club of India in New Delhi to protest against the raids carried out by the authorities. The protesters called for the immediate release of those arrested to safeguard India’s freedom of news reporting. A dozen Indian media associations also wrote to the Chief Justice of India to request intervention by the courts.
These people are badly confused. Investigating whether NewsClick receives funding or takes orders from China has nothing to do with press freedom, which is a matter between democratic countries and their citizens, whereas the NewsClick case is a question of China using a democratic country’s press freedom to spread CCP propaganda, wage cognitive warfare on the CCP’s behalf and threaten these countries’ internal security. China has established media branches in many countries, or uses various means to control these countries’ media, but it does not allow foreign investors to operate media companies in China. The Chinese authorities readily arrest foreign reporters on charges of “espionage.” No matter whether they are accused of “subverting state power” or the lesser charge of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” they all end up in jail. Considering these differences, how can the world’s democratic and authoritarian camps have equal relations with regard to freedom of the press?
Among the world’s democratic camp, apart from the US, which is big and powerful enough to resist Chinese infiltration and engage in “competition” with China, any other country that wants to challenge China on its own would surely lose. They are not economically and militarily strong enough to resist Chinese infiltration. If it were not for the US’ support, Taiwan would long ago have ceased to exist as a country, as Chinese infiltration would have turned it into something else.
Taiwan’s national security agencies are trying to take more decisive measures to root out traitors. To accomplish this, it is especially important for judicial departments to cooperate.
Looking to the future, India is one of the main countries for resistance against China. The New York Times report is clearly in line with India’s strategic aim of eliminating internal threats. India is one of Taiwan’s strategic partners, with plenty of scope for political, economic and military cooperation. Although India still has various problems such as the caste system, as a democracy, it should be able to resolve them over time.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS