A few days ago the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) in the US hosted its annual Double Ten National Day banquet at Twin Oaks estate in Washington.
A week earlier, the Chinese embassy in the US also hosted a national day reception. The contrast between the celebrations reflects the two nations’ state of relations with the US.
The Double Ten National Day banquet at Twin Oaks showcased Washington’s support for Taiwan. The highlight of this year’s event was the presence of US Representative Michael McCaul, chairman of the US House of Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs, who was attending the celebration for the first time and stayed from beginning to end. McCaul’s attendance was especially important, as it came as former US House speaker Kevin McCarthy was being ousted.
Furthermore, two US representatives cochairing the Congressional Taiwan Caucus also attended the banquet, further showing that the US Congress has always been a key force in supporting Taiwan.
In 2011, TECRO held the Double Ten National Day banquet at Twin Oaks for the first time in decades, breaking with convention that the celebration could only be held at a hotel after the US severed diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979.
In 2012, then-American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) chairman Raymond Burghardt was invited to speak at the banquet, which has since become tradition, with AIT Chair Laura Rosenberger attending this year’s event.
Although Rosenberger only assumed the position in March, her appointment as AIT chair is significant. She had worked closely with US President Joe Biden and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. She had served as a special assistant to the president and the US National Security Council’s senior director for China and Taiwan.
In April 2021, the US Department of State announced new guidelines for interacting with Taiwan, allowing US government officials and their Taiwanese counterparts to meet in official settings. With that restriction eased, US officials can participate in Taiwan’s events at Twin Oaks Estate. However, some more significant occasions, such as Double Ten National Day celebrations, are still restricted to maintain the appearance of the US’ “one China” policy.
In 2019, the celebration of China’s national day in Washington marked a turning point. Although it was the 40th anniversary of the establishment of US-China relations, the two countries were caught in a serious trade dispute, and the reception was anything but festive.
The highest-ranking US official attending the event was the deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, whose name was not even mentioned in China’s news release on the celebration.
This year, despite having a new Chinese ambassador, Xie Feng (謝鋒), who assumed the post in May, the Chinese embassy’s reception — held for the first time since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and marking the 74th anniversary of the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China — was not as grand as it used to be.
Three US officials attended: US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink; former AIT director and current Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kin Moy; and US National Security Council Senior Director for China and Taiwan Affairs Sarah Beran, Rosenberger’s successor in that position. Kritenbrink stayed for less than half an hour. No US officials were invited to speak.
Before attending the reception, Kritenbrink met with Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Sun Weidong (孫衛東). Clearly, the two sides did not see eye to eye. China’s reception and Kritenbrink’s brief attendance also showed that US-China relations remain cold.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor