There have been heated discussions online about retired navy captain Kuo Hsi’s (郭璽) allegations that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) shared classified information about Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program with foreign entities.
Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) said an investigation has been launched. Certainly, these allegations deserve a serious, impartial and hopefully swift investigation.
However, many members of online defense communities are already jumping to conclusions based on Kuo’s allegations even though Ma has yet to be implicated.
This is partly due to the public’s mistrust of the KMT being able to handle defense matters. KMT politicians have been known to be unfairly critical of Taiwan’s efforts to shore up defense against a bellicose China.
For instance, Ma appeared on the political talk show Situation Room (少康戰情室), criticizing Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine project; the clip of her appearance was then shown on Chinese state media.
It is undeniable that the construction of Hai Kun-class submarines is an important milestone for Taiwan’s military-industrial complex. Itcan be expected to bring new capabilities to Taiwan’s navy and serve as an effective deterrent against Chinese aggression.
Although submarines are generally expensive investments, once all eight Hai Kun-class vessels are built, the fleet would certainly become a headache for Chinese military planners as it would add an extra dimension to maritime warfare.
Nonetheless, there are multiple components to the potential information leak that seem to paint a more complex, if not contradictory, picture.
Allegedly, after Kuo’s business negotiations with a South Korean submarine consultant had broken down, the consultant released a substantial amount of information about the Indigenous Defense Submarine project to several legislators, including Ma.
Recordings released by the KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) allegedly indicate that Kuo wanted to be the intermediary between the South Korean submarine consultant and the navy, implying that Kuo had much to gain financially from the submarine’s construction.
Kuo said those recordings were edited out of context, and that the South Korean consultant released the recordings because he was bitter after being fired from the project.
It is becoming more difficult to separate defense policy from politics. This is particularly true when it comes to this investigation.
The KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party are seeking to capitalize on this investigation in light of the upcoming presidential election. Political pundits have discussed this case disproportionately on their talk shows, despite limited unbiased information. The escalation of discourse is unproductive.
With the conflicting business interests and political motivations involved in this investigation, the truth most likely lies somewhere between Kuo’s allegations and Ma’s counter-allegations. At this point, Kuo and Ma should be presumed innocent.
This scandal should not distractfrom the important role the Hai Kun-class submarines can be expected play in the defense of Taiwan’s waters.
It is premature to jump to any conclusions regarding the allegations without an official verdict. All the information released at this point paints a murky picture.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS