There have been heated discussions online about retired navy captain Kuo Hsi’s (郭璽) allegations that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) shared classified information about Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program with foreign entities.
Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) said an investigation has been launched. Certainly, these allegations deserve a serious, impartial and hopefully swift investigation.
However, many members of online defense communities are already jumping to conclusions based on Kuo’s allegations even though Ma has yet to be implicated.
This is partly due to the public’s mistrust of the KMT being able to handle defense matters. KMT politicians have been known to be unfairly critical of Taiwan’s efforts to shore up defense against a bellicose China.
For instance, Ma appeared on the political talk show Situation Room (少康戰情室), criticizing Taiwan’s Indigenous Defense Submarine project; the clip of her appearance was then shown on Chinese state media.
It is undeniable that the construction of Hai Kun-class submarines is an important milestone for Taiwan’s military-industrial complex. Itcan be expected to bring new capabilities to Taiwan’s navy and serve as an effective deterrent against Chinese aggression.
Although submarines are generally expensive investments, once all eight Hai Kun-class vessels are built, the fleet would certainly become a headache for Chinese military planners as it would add an extra dimension to maritime warfare.
Nonetheless, there are multiple components to the potential information leak that seem to paint a more complex, if not contradictory, picture.
Allegedly, after Kuo’s business negotiations with a South Korean submarine consultant had broken down, the consultant released a substantial amount of information about the Indigenous Defense Submarine project to several legislators, including Ma.
Recordings released by the KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) allegedly indicate that Kuo wanted to be the intermediary between the South Korean submarine consultant and the navy, implying that Kuo had much to gain financially from the submarine’s construction.
Kuo said those recordings were edited out of context, and that the South Korean consultant released the recordings because he was bitter after being fired from the project.
It is becoming more difficult to separate defense policy from politics. This is particularly true when it comes to this investigation.
The KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party are seeking to capitalize on this investigation in light of the upcoming presidential election. Political pundits have discussed this case disproportionately on their talk shows, despite limited unbiased information. The escalation of discourse is unproductive.
With the conflicting business interests and political motivations involved in this investigation, the truth most likely lies somewhere between Kuo’s allegations and Ma’s counter-allegations. At this point, Kuo and Ma should be presumed innocent.
This scandal should not distractfrom the important role the Hai Kun-class submarines can be expected play in the defense of Taiwan’s waters.
It is premature to jump to any conclusions regarding the allegations without an official verdict. All the information released at this point paints a murky picture.
Linus Chiou is a part-time writer based in Kaohsiung.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS