Robert Kennedy Jr, scion of the Massachusetts-based Kennedy political clan, is expected to announce tomorrow that he would not take part in any Democratic Party primary election, but would instead run as an independent candidate in next year’s US presidential election. This would pit him against fellow Democrat US President Joe Biden, who intends to run for re-election. The US media are not making a fuss about Kennedy’s plan to run, nor is anyone in the Democratic Party calling for “unity” or “consolidation,” or saying that anyone with low opinion poll ratings should quit the race. Indeed, Kennedy has the right to run if he wants to.
Voting and standing in elections are both statutory rights in any democracy. With the rules of the game set out beforehand, the emphasis is on open and fair competition, not allowing politicians to act as “kingmakers” by forcing political parties with different philosophies to cobble together a pair of electoral candidates. While such a “teamwork” strategy might be euphemistically called “uniting the opposition,” its real aim is to divide the spoils after winning the election, all in the name of “rotation of parties in government.”
Independent candidate Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) call for a “coalition of mainstream public opinion” and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to co-opt Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) both deviate from the normal logic of party politics, which is for candidates to compete openly and win recognition by virtue of their party’s ideas and policies. If a merger is planned before an election, it would be a matter not of free competition, but of horse trading.
The proposal for a “blue-white alliance” is an attempt by the conservative KMT to merge with the TPP, which has no ideology to speak of. More than that, it is an attempt by the KMT to swallow the TPP, because it would have a direct impact on the TPP’s raison d’etre and the KMT’s modus operandi in this election.
The KMT’s strategy in elections has always been to sow division among Taiwanese. This time, it wants to use Ko to take away a share of the votes that would otherwise go to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). However, contrary to the KMT’s expectations, Ko is attracting votes away from the KMT.
In the past, the KMT has generally picked a “hereditary pan-blue” as its presidential candidate, partnered with a Taiwanese candidate for vice president. On this occasion, however, it has broken the mold by nominating Taiwanese Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its presidential candidate with another Taiwanese to stand for vice president, so it would be strange if “hereditary pan-blues” did not rise up in revolt.
Some of those who propose a “blue-white alliance” suggest comparing the three “non-green” candidates’ standing in opinion polls, and that the losers should either quit the race or accept standing for vice president, with the goal of achieving a “rotation of governing parties.”
However, although opinion polls have a scientific basis, they cannot precisely predict voting results. Otherwise, why spend so much money on organizing elections when everything could be decided by opinion polls?
Democratic elections involve open competition with political power going to the winner. In Taiwan, as in many other countries, any president is legally limited to two terms. However, there is no such time limit for a political party to be in power. The notion of so-called “rotation of governing parties” is therefore just a misleading slogan. It is up to the voters to decide whether there should be a change of party in government. In no sense do parties “take turns” in power, otherwise even the New Party, which has almost completely faded away, would sooner or later have its turn in office.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS