The EU is looking at ways to lock down improvements in its working relationship with the US in case former US president Donald Trump wins next year’s presidential election.
Officials from the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, told senior trade officials from member states last week that they need to make agreements “Trump proof,” people briefed on the discussions said.
That means acting quickly to nail down binding agreements with US President Joe Biden’s administration, the sources said, asking not to be named. Member states were also told to be realistic about how much tougher negotiations could become if they fail to move quickly, they added.
Trump, 77, holds a lead over his rivals in the contest for the Republican nomination, despite his mounting legal troubles, while the EU is still trying to find a permanent solution to the dispute over steel and aluminum imports that blew up last time he was in office.
That four-year term shook the foundations of the transatlantic relationship as Trump questioned Europe’s security guarantees, attacked the WTO and launched regular broadsides at countries like Germany for supposedly taking the US for a ride. That underscores how difficult the task would be, even if agreements are binding.
Trump also walked away from the North American Free Trade Agreement and slapped punishing tariffs on steel and aluminum. He sent the US stock market into a tailspin — and provoked a tit-for-tat response — after imposing billions of dollars in levies on Chinese goods.
“Many, many things were a total shock,” German Minister of Foreign Affairs Annalena Baerbock said in an interview with Bloomberg Television last month. “Hardly anybody in Europe could imagine there would be a US president who would question NATO.”
Europe must be ready to work with Trump if he wins, she said, and it would be “naive” not to prepare for such an outcome.
Baerbock is among the European officials seeking to ensure that the EU is not caught out again if Trump can complete a political comeback.
She visited Texas this month to build ties with Republican officials. Other EU governments are also reaching out to the GOP and trying to identify people who might end up being close to another Trump administration, a senior EU diplomat said.
There is concern that a second Trump term could be worse than the first because the frequent chaos of his previous four years in office could deter well-qualified people from joining the administration, the diplomat said.
“President Biden is committed to developing strong, lasting agreements with key partners around the world,” a spokesperson for the US National Security Council said. “Every initiative and commitment we have pursued with the EU is designed to be enduring in both form and substance.”
While Biden’s rhetoric might be more conciliatory than Trump’s, and his alignment with the EU over Ukraine has helped to repair the transatlantic relationship, EU officials are conscious that his trade policy still has much in common with Trump’s approach.
The Europeans were shaken, in particular, by Biden’s US$390 billion-plus subsidy program to support green technology, which offers companies an incentive to shift investment from Europe to the US.
That is another thing they want to get resolved before the election.
European officials are aiming to resolve disputes over both the steel tariffs and the subsidy program when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen visits the White House on Oct. 20, the sources said.
The bloc is nearing an agreement with the US on critical raw-materials that would allow European manufacturers to benefit from some of the tax credits offered by the US.
The commission is also seeking concessions on issues including renewable energies and local assembly requirements to qualify for electrical vehicles subsidies.
The bloc has also raised concerns about the support provided for EV charging points and “Buy America” provisions in infrastructure projects where European firms risk being excluded.
In addition, senior EU and US officials are exploring new agreements on supply chains, artificial intelligence, export controls or standards under the Trade and Technology Council.
At their meeting in Zaragoza, Spain, last month, the European side discussed the need to conclude any agreements with the US in a way that is binding to avoid a return of past disputes, the sources said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS