The Executive Yuan on Monday said that the government would increase childcare allowances by NT$1,500 (US$46.49) per month starting next year in a bid to boost Taiwan’s birthrate.
However, Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) said that, despite the government’s budget for such measures being raised over the past seven years from NT$15 billion in 2016 to a projected NT$120.1 billion next year, birthrates continue to decline.
An increase in monthly subsidies to NT$7,000 from NT$5,500 would be welcomed by lower and middle-income families who already have children in daycare or kindergarten, but it would not encourage anyone on the fence about having children to take the plunge.
New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, said that the low birthrate is driven by people getting married older and having children later, as well as by soaring housing and childcare costs.
Hou is partly right, but he neglected to mention that availability of childcare options is too limited in many parts of the country, particularly Taipei and New Taipei City. Parents hoping to put their children in a public kindergarten have to enter a lottery system. There are even waiting lists to get into private institutions.
As most couples — especially those in large cities where rent is higher — are both forced to work, sending their children to daycare or kindergarten is the only option. Many have moved from elsewhere in the country, meaning that they live far from family who might otherwise help with childcare.
Another issue is the high cost of housing. To his credit, Hou has promised that if he becomes president, he would implement a one-time housing subsidy of NT$1 million for households in an income tax bracket below 30 percent with three or more children and who do not own property.
This is more in the right direction than what the Executive Yuan is proposing, but is too limited in scope to really tackle the issue.
The government needs to rein in housing prices and speculation. A report on March 7 cited Sinyi Realty Inc as saying that average home prices in the previous quarter had topped NT$10 million in major cities, despite a slowdown in transactions amid economic uncertainty. Thirty-year mortgage costs would be roughly 33 percent of a household’s monthly income for the average family, the report said. That would be a heavy burden for a young couple also facing childcare costs.
Moreover, the average down payment on such a mortgage would be about NT$2 million, which is likely to be out of reach for many.
Rent offers little respite, with a July report showing rents in major cities were up about 2 percent year-on-year this year, which, combined with high inflation, is more than the increase in real income.
There are too many barriers preventing the average couple from raising children in Taiwan. Cities are not family-friendly, with a lack of sidewalks that can accommodate strollers, many buildings have no elevators or ramps, as well as too few family parking spaces and a lack of parking overall.
Combined with a lack of affordable housing and childcare facilities, and work environments that remain unfriendly toward parents — particularly mothers — the situation creates little motivation for couples to conceive.
If the government is serious about tackling the declining birthrate, it would need a multifaceted approach that provides more housing and childcare options, mandates flexible work environments, and fixes problems with pedestrian infrastructure and parking. If it does not make these changes, the birthrate is unlikely to increase any time soon.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion