During a news conference in Vietnam on Sept. 10, a reporter asked US President Joe Biden about the possibility of China invading Taiwan. Biden replied that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is too busy handling major domestic economic problems to launch an invasion of Taiwan.
On Wednesday last week, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office published a document outlining 21 measures to make the Chinese-controlled Fujian Province into a demonstration zone for relations with Taiwan. The planned measures would expand favorable treatment for Taiwanese people and companies, and seek to attract people from Taiwan to buy property and seek employment in Fujian. In so doing, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is once again applying its two-handed strategy of using peaceful and military methods. Its resort to peaceful methods indirectly confirms what Biden said at the news conference.
For the CCP, when there are things that it cannot achieve through war, it would be better to achieve them through peaceful and less costly “united front” methods. As current conditions are not good for launching a military invasion of Taiwan, it is not surprising to see China playing its “united front” card.
Of course Biden does not have the last word on whether China would launch a military invasion of Taiwan, but for the time being the US enjoys an undisputed leading position in the world. Consequently, US presidents get to see a daily array of intelligence information, gathered and summarized through the US’ technological capabilities or through military, diplomatic, economic and other channels. Biden therefore has greater access to intelligence than other countries’ leaders, and his statements are based on the information he receives.
Another important external factor is the changes that have taken place in the international situation. China’s position in the world today is no longer what it was when Xi became president 10 years ago. Notably, Biden has in recent years adopted a strategy of “vertical and horizontal alliances,” seeking alliances with democratic countries and including relatively new partners like India and Vietnam.
As well as consolidating NATO, this strategy has strung together a united front of countries in the Indo-Pacific region, including the US, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia, India and other countries, forming a containment network around communist China. This arrangement poses a new deterrent effect against Xi and his ambition to use military force against Taiwan. It makes Xi more cautious about the price that China would have to pay for attacking Taiwan.
Biden’s “decisive” remarks shouldould help to calm the global atmosphere, which is currently affected by international media making a lot of noise about military confrontation and the danger of war across the Taiwan Strait. Biden’s remarks would also shore up worldwide companies’ confidence about investing in Taiwan and shut the mouths of certain Taiwanese politicians who try to win political points by playing on the theme of “war and peace.”
Of course, Taiwan should not take it easy and let down its guard because of a few words from Biden. On the contrary, it should seize the opportunity to strengthen itself, deepen its democracy, make more connections and garner more international recognition and support.
Paul Lei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS