Before an election, candidates always make promises to attract voters’ attention. The most common one is offering better welfare programs, such as health insurance. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, has proposed full healthcare subsidies for people aged 65 or older, as well as indigenous people aged 55 to 64.
“Free healthcare for every senior, all of them,” Hou said at the time.
If a nation is fiscally stable and does not have a budget deficit, I would support any kind of social welfare policy. What worries me is when candidates make promises, do they ever think of where they would get the money to finance it? Could this policy go on for years? Would it be a half-baked policy implemented with a bang, only to fade with a whimper?
The most telling example is the one advocating “free textbooks.” During previous elections, many mayoral and county commissioner candidates proposed providing free textbooks. After they were elected, they did keep their promises. Fully funded by the local governments, all elementary and junior-high schools provided textbooks for free.
It should have been a wonderful thing for all, but the happiness did not last long. After a few years, textbooks were no longer free due to financial reasons. Those local governments were mocked as just trying too hard to impress. They also had to bear the consequences for years to come.
Compared with free textbooks, “free healthcare for all seniors” is a much bigger issue that needs to be carefully thought out. For one, Taiwan is an aging society, with people aged 65 or older comprising 14 percent of the population.
By 2025, when Taiwan is expected to become a super-aged society, the percentage is likely to reach 20; in other words, one out of five people would be 65 or older. Moreover, if the birthrate is lower than the mortality rate, the problems that an aging society must confront would be even more serious.
As the population of seniors continues to grow, the government would have to provide more and funds and resources to finance healthcare. Has the candidate promising “free healthcare for all seniors” thought this through?
It has become increasingly difficult for the government to make ends meet to support the National Health Insurance (NHI) system. The NHI supplementary premium policy was implemented to address this problem, and the premium has been raised several times.
Even with such careful planning, it is still hard to keep finances stable. If the government pushes forward with free healthcare for all citizens 65 or older without careful evaluation, the budget deficit would worsen and the system might go belly-up.
Also, from a relativist viewpoint, if seniors do not have to pay healthcare fees, others would have to pay more. This is not a fair arrangement and would make things harder for other age categories. Those advocating free healthcare must consider all these aspects carefully.
As a Taiwanese proverb says, an outsider would not understand the difficulty of doing the actual job; also, what has been said does not necessarily lead to a welcome result.
Those lacking experience in government do not know how difficult it is to run a government and make things work. Instead of making promises to voters, candidates should be more pragmatic and propose realistic policies that suit the country and which discerning voters can support.
Hu Yen
Taipei
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS