From Aug. 25 to Sunday, about 200 works were displayed in the exhibition “A Vision for Transforming Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Park” at C-LAB, which used to be the Air Force Command Headquarters. Unfortunately, only a few people got to see the exhibition, as the Ministry of Culture appeared to have lost interest in it.
When it comes to transitional justice, the question of how to transform the Chiang Kai-shek (CKS) Memorial Park has been subject to endless debate. Last year, the ministry commissioned three non-governmental organizations to organize a conceptual design competition called “100 Ways,” hoping to stimulate the creativity of participants to find new ways in which the park could be utilized.
Public submissions for the competition started in July last year, and in March, the judges chose the top five entries each for the student and open categories.
EXHIBITION DELAY
The exhibition was originally scheduled to be held at the CKS Memorial Park right after the winners were announced and to last for two-and-a-half months. However, the ministry postponed the exhibition to late last month, reduced its duration to 17 days and relocated it to C-LAB.
Separating the exhibition from the competition event and moving it made it look like the ministry was intentionally downplaying the exhibition, discouraging people from engaging with it.
This not only let hundreds of enthusiastic young people down, it essentially covered up their creativity. Moreover, it closed the space for dialogue on transitional justice — especially the complex issues associated with the CKS Memorial Park.
Many works in the exhibition did not exhibit a strong critical attitude toward historical injustices. Some people who might have expected the younger generation to express a sense of justice might have felt disappointed, but young people have their own perspective on the subject.
Participants disagreed with the original allocation of the park for commemorating authoritarianism; they hoped to transform the situation: Promoting more diverse activities in the park, for example, would highlight the importance of citizens and the rejection of authoritarianism that their life and liberty represent.
YOUNG PERSPECTIVE
This design orientation was active and coherent, showing the vision of the younger generation. It was an opportunity for further social debate on this issue. Why did the ministry turn its back on this, instead of promoting and making good use of the event?
Decisionmakers shied away from this contentious issue without understanding the collective consciousness of the younger generation on display in the exhibition. Such risk avoidance is only human, but it is the wrong way for people in positions of leadership to act.
DIALOGUE
The lifting of martial law and bringing about a transfer of power was the result of the efforts of courageous predecessors, and we should keep working on transitional justice. The ministry should not shirk its responsibility in this regard.
The exhibition organizers should let citizens seize this opportunity to communicate and extend the duration of the exhibition. The event should be hosted in central and southern Taiwan as well, and back to the CKS Memorial Park for two more months, giving citizens the opportunity to imagine the possibilities that the park offers.
Hochen Tan is a former minister of transportation and communications.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises