Commemorating a coup can be difficult, especially in Latin America, where coups, and the military caudillos that often follow, have been commonplace. The Sept. 11, 1973 putsch that overthrew the democratically elected Chilean president Salvador Allende could be considered one of many. Yet this tragedy has some unique characteristics, captured in the stream of books, documentaries and commentaries — some with new revelations — marking the coup’s 50th anniversary and assessing Allende’s presidency, which ended in his untimely death.
Allende promised democratic socialism: a peaceful revolution flavored “with empanadas and red wine,” as he put it, underscoring his political project’s unique national character. A socialist system achieved through free elections, rather than martially imposed on society, represented a historical novelty, and people as far away as Italy and France watched with great interest. To this day, many Chileans remember Allende’s government for its sincere efforts to empower the disenfranchised.
General Augusto Pinochet’s brutal evisceration of this experiment is also singular. Despite previous coups in Latin America, never before had a presidential palace been bombed, nor a president’s body pulled from the wreckage. It was an institutional and untypical military putsch motivated more by personal ambition than ideology. The armed forces and police backed Pinochet.
That reflected many factors. Even before taking office, US president Richard Nixon’s administration virulently attacked Allende, as engineered by then-national security adviser Henry Kissinger and implemented by the CIA. Both the Church Committee report, prepared by the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in 1975-76 and the meticulous research by Peter Kornbluh, a senior analyst at the National Security Archive, have documented these interventions in detail.
An explicitly socialist political project was going to encounter fierce resistance and needed strong leadership to halt conservative attacks, yet Allende’s Popular Unity alliance failed to back up his intentions with consistency.
For example, the government’s policy of pump-priming the economy via increased consumption was unsustainable. Without greater investment, his approach inevitably created a passing boom that ended in shortages, a widespread black market and hyperinflation.
Allende’s coalition also largely disengaged from international affairs, defined by the Cold War. Beyond espousing anticolonial rhetoric, his government pursued close ties with Cuba, illustrated by Fidel Castro’s 23-day visit in 1971; the coalition failed attempted to establish a privileged relationship with the Soviet Union; it clashed with the US, which adamantly over expropriation of US corporations.
Allende’s major failure was an inability to shore up enough social and political support against intense foreign and domestic pressure. He had the chance to build a broad coalition: In the 1970 Chilean presidential election, Allende and Radomiro Tomic, the Christian Democratic candidate, ran on similar platforms; both proposed deep structural reforms. Allende spoke of the “Chilean road to socialism,” Tomic of the “non-capitalist road to development.” Together they obtained 64.7 percent of the vote.
Despite seemingly similar ideas for ensuring the “social and political unity of the people,” as Tomic put it, the Christian Democrats aligned with the right-wing National Party, forming a potent opposition bloc. Allende was never able to carry out a democratic and peaceful revolution with only 37 percent of the vote.
Absent a strong alliance of the center and the left, democratic efforts to reshape the structures of power are doomed to fail. Enrico Berlinguer, the former secretary-general of the Italian Communist Party (the largest in the West), recognized this fact and, in the same year as Allende’s ouster, proposed a “historic compromise” with the Christian Democrats and other Italian political parties.
The main lesson from Chile’s failed road to socialism is more relevant than ever, as President Gabriel Boric appears to be assuming Allende’s mantle. Before entering the presidential palace in March 2022, Boric broke protocol to bow before a statue of Allende. He has also promised to reopen “the great avenues” to “a better society,” as Allende predicted others would do in his famous final broadcast. A “new Chilean way” might emerge, capable of resolving social tensions under democratic rule and satisfying the widespread desire for institutional change.
Yet Boric’s 18 months in office have been hard. Shortly after his inauguration, voters resoundingly rejected the first draft of a new constitution, mainly independent and left-leaning convention. The draft’s excessive focus on progressive priorities such as environmental protection and indigenous rights proved too radical for most Chileans. A second constitutional referendum to be held in December, is a new text drafted by a large far-right majority, yet the outcome remains uncertain; an increasingly hostile Congress has failed to pass Boric’s tax, social-security and health-care reforms.
Despite winning 55.9 percent of the vote, Boric has struggled to translate his electoral majority into a legislative majority. He now faces the same challenge as Allende: transforming society through democracy without a broad political coalition. Boric must learn from Allende and forge strong alliances, and quickly, as polls show growing nostalgia for Pinochet’s dictatorship, reflected in the far right’s popularity, led by Jose Antonio Kast. Without that, a government that was seeking everything could again be left with nothing.
Jorge G. Castaneda, a former foreign minister of Mexico, is a professor at New York University and the author of America Through Foreign Eyes. Carlos Ominami was minister of economy in Chile’s first post-dictatorship democratic government.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea