Although the local elections only took place last year, media and public attention has already moved on to next year’s presidential election. It seems that little attention has been given to whether the newly elected civil representatives are carrying out their duties properly, as outlined in Article 35 to 37 in the Local Government Act (地方制度法).
There has been little media coverage so far, let alone reviews or assessments of the representatives’ performances.
Recently, a local civil organization called Tainan City Council Watch (台南議會觀察聯盟) published a review report on the first meeting of the fourth session of the Tainan City Council. The review method relied on quantitative and qualitative research. Those who had uncovered major problems in proposals or achieved other feats received extra credit, while those who had a poor attendance rate or did not perform well during question-and-answer sessions had points deducted. The report commended the performance of 15 city councilors, while four were put on “probation,” requiring improvement.
From a local self-governance perspective, grassroots-level non-governmental organizations (NGOs) supervising local councils is a laudable milestone for regional democracy.
However, as local media have long been focused on events in Taipei, there has been little coverage about the report, whether in the press or digital media.
A “second democratic reform,” which focuses on decentralization, privatization of state enterprises and promoting civil political participation to address Taiwan’s stalled political reform, was the key recommendation proposed by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in his final years.
As decentralization was a main theme in the recommendation, Lee had called on the central government to empower local governments with more authority regarding personnel, education and finance because, judging by government efficiency and national finances at the time, the central government would be incapable of dealing with various tasks in a diverse society.
The idea echoed the famous saying that “all politics is local.” Establishing a well-founded and sustainable local democratic system or a fundamental degree of autonomy is tantamount to achieving a healthy, vibrant central democratic system.
Strangely, several incumbent Taipei councilors, who were hoping to gain an edge over others in next year’s legislative elections with publicity and media attention, started criticizing Kaohsiung’s Cianjhen Fishing Port renovation project, Tainan’s Shalun Smart Green Energy Science City and the Pingtung Baseball Field, which all fell beyond their jurisdiction. This kind of meddling, busybody behavior should be condemned in any city council, and would not be tolerated if there had been a Taipei City Council Watch.
The public should give more attention to NGOs such as Tainan City Council Watch, so that similar organizations can be established across Taiwan, thereby realizing a minimum level of decentralization. Their presence would serve as a supervisory rating system, providing local citizens with an impartial performance assessment of city or county councilors.
In this way, the local elections might finally shake off the pomposity that political campaigns bring, and instead introduce rational public discussion and debate.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Rita Wang
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS