In July 2019, then-British secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs Jeremy Hunt launched a global campaign for media freedom at a London conference co-organized by the Canadian government.
“Today, we are joined by delegations from over 100 countries… Never before have so many countries come together in this cause,” he proudly announced.
The event established the Media Freedom Coalition, and more than 50 countries have since joined.
The impetus behind the media freedom initiative was the October 2018 assassination of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. Khashoggi’s gruesome murder was a state-sanctioned killing orchestrated by individuals at the highest echelons of the Saudi regime. In the wake of his death, media freedom quickly rose to the top of the UK government’s foreign policy agenda.
The media freedom campaign represented a rare lull in the tense geopolitical climate that followed the 2016 Brexit referendum and the election of former US president Donald Trump. It also offered a unique opportunity for the UK to provide genuine leadership on an issue that the international community had largely overlooked.
The July 2019 conference managed to attract significant (albeit not spectacular) government participation and received support from civil society groups worldwide. Prominent global figures joined the initiative, including human-rights lawyer Amal Clooney, who was appointed the UK’s special envoy on media freedom. On a smaller scale, during my time at BBC Media Action, I organized a gathering of leading international media-support organizations in London. The aim was to assist in the organization of the conference, a process that initially required addressing concerns that the effort was merely a post-Brexit public relations exercise. Numerous other individuals and organizations dedicated their time, as well as their personal and professional reputations, to ensure that the conference and ensuing campaign would deliver tangible results.
However, the British government’s recent decision to invite Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (widely known as MBS), who US intelligence agencies have identified as having sanctioned the Khashoggi assassination, calls into question its commitment to media freedom.
To be fair, in seeking to re-establish economic and political ties with Saudi Arabia, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak follows in the footsteps of French President Emmanuel Macron, US President Joe Biden and other leaders, all of whom have faced accusations of hypocrisy from human-rights organizations. Given the UK’s current economic weakness, Sunak might have found it harder to buck the trend.
However, hypocrisy aside, MBS’ upcoming visit to London shatters any illusion that the UK can provide the moral leadership required to defend democracy, media freedom, or the rules-based international order. Worse, it devalues the efforts of those who supported its initiatives.
Admittedly, the media freedom campaign and follow-up conferences have had little impact. While they have motivated like-minded governments and stakeholders to reaffirm their commitment to the cause, they have been far less effective at curbing attacks on journalists or addressing the political and financial challenges facing independent news organizations around the world.
The UK’s own credibility has also taken a hit. In September 2020, Clooney resigned from her role as media freedom envoy over the British government’s Internal Market Bill, which aimed to regulate post-Brexit domestic trade and — as the government itself acknowledged — violated international law.
The government’s campaign has failed to achieve the goal of producing an internationally coordinated and properly funded strategy to support public-interest media. Remarkably, the resources provided by the UK government to international media support have actually decreased in recent years, despite its pledges to increase funding. Similarly, the financial-aid budgets of other prominent coalition members, such as Canada and the Netherlands, have remained largely unchanged.
Vibrant, independent news media remain the best defense against autocracy.
However, as news organizations face an existential financial crisis, the prospect of a coordinated and well-funded global strategy to support journalism remains almost as distant as it was when the media freedom initiative was launched more than four years ago.
As Hunt observed, the fact that Khashoggi was murdered inside a diplomatic mission represented a clear threat to the rules-based international order. Initially, Hunt’s media freedom campaign appeared to be a serious response to this threat and a much-needed display of political leadership, and the Media Freedom Coalition, currently co-chaired by Estonia and the Netherlands, might still produce meaningful results. Several countries, such as France and the US, have recently stepped up their support for independent media, partly through initiatives like the International Fund for Public Interest Media (which I co-founded).
However, MBS’ upcoming UK visit suggests that the UK and other countries are wavering in their commitment to protecting media freedom. If the British government is serious about upholding democracy and protecting the rules-based international order, it should devote significant funds to support public-interest news organizations and live up to its promise to “stand with those who seek to report the truth and bring the facts to light.”
James Deane, a former director of policy and research at BBC Media Action, is co-founder of the International Fund for Public Interest Media and an independent consultant.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial
When a Reuters reporter asked Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) about Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung’s (林佳龍) European tour, Lin Jian expressed displeasure, referring to Lin Chia-lung as “merely a local foreign affairs official in China,” and reiterating the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) oft-used claim that Taiwan is a Chinese “province.” This response is a political falsehood. Although such statements have become standard fare in the CCP’s external messaging, they expose its deepest anxieties. The CCP fears confronting international reality and is even unnerved by the prospect of Taiwan’s subjectivity on the world stage. The CCP
RSS