The US’ sanctioning last week of Chinese officials involved in Beijing’s ongoing criminal efforts to erase Tibet as a separate political, ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious entity showed the nation at its best.
Few other governments give a hoot. Most cravenly look the other way.
Citing a recent UN report on the “forced assimilation” of 1 million Tibetan children ordered into Mandarin-language state boarding schools far from their homes and families, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken demanded China stop trying to eradicate Tibet’s distinct identity.
Illustration: Mountain People
“We urge PRC [People’s Republic of China] authorities to end the coercion of Tibetan children into government-run boarding schools and to cease repressive assimilation policies in Tibet and other parts of the PRC,” Blinken said in a statement on Tuesday last week, apparently referring to Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Hong Kong, where the right to self-determination is also denied.
That the US’ senior diplomat was ready to take a public, principled stand would infuriate and puzzle Beijing, which has occupied Tibet since 1950. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his callous communist cadres do not do principles. For them, altruism in foreign policy is an alien concept.
US President Joe Biden’s administration is trying to patch up rocky relations with China, so it is all the more impressive that it feels strongly enough about Beijing’s systemic abuses of democratic and human rights to speak out, regardless of possible negative repercussions.
It is doubly refreshing after a week when a herd of middle-ranking, ethically challenged, mostly undemocratic governments kowtowed to Xi at the BRICS summit in South Africa. They seem to think China would build a fairer, juster world. Are these leaders naive, corrupt or merely stupid?
Prior to the start of his visit to China yesterday, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs James Cleverly, the top envoy of another middling power, said that he, too, would raise human rights concerns when he visits China. British ministers always say that. Then nothing changes. Why is he going to China at all? Apparently it is to maintain dialogue (as if one genuinely existed). He claims the UK has “agency,” can exert influence.
This is delusional. The Chinese party behemoth, spying, bullying and hacking, beating up protesters in Manchester, torching the Hong Kong Joint Declaration, backing neofascist Vladimir Putin, besieging democratic Taiwan and plotting an authoritarian “new world order” is simply not listening, especially now Europe and Britain no longer speak as one.
Xi gives not a fig for the UK’s China policy — not least because the Conservatives cannot agree one. However, the US is a different matter. Perhaps Blinken’s demarche would give him pause. Tibet is another dangerous flashpoint among too many — and what is happening there is one huge crime against humanity.
The mass abuses of Tibetan children is part of a deliberate scheme to alter Tibet’s demographics, entrench the dominance of majority Han Chinese people and culture, and suppress Tibetan Buddhist religious practice, language and media.
“The Chinese government is tearing families apart and forcing these vulnerable children to become strangers to their own Tibetan culture,” Gyal Lo, a Tibetan educational sociologist, told the Free Tibet pressure group.
A second UN inquiry this year reported that hundreds of thousands of Tibetans have been removed from their homes and workplaces in rural areas and assigned to low-skill “vocational training” and low-paid employment, thereby undermining identity and traditional communities.
Campaigners provide evidence of numerous excesses, including arbitrary detention, torture, sexual crimes, disappearances and severe punishment of dissent. In a sense, Tibet is in permanent lockdown. Passports to leave are virtually unobtainable. Foreign media are denied entry. China wants it forgotten.
Vigils, marches and sit-ins still take place, despite heavy-handed paramilitary policing and ubiquitous surveillance, and are usually peaceful, Free Tibet said.
“However, the Chinese authorities are growing increasingly intolerant... Many [protests] are met with a violent response,” it said.
Last year, at least three Tibetans self-immolated. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom has also said that “the Chinese government’s control and suppression of Tibetan Buddhism has intensified, with authorities restricting Tibetans’ access to religious sites, banning religious gatherings, and destroying sites and symbols.”
“Monks and nuns have been subjected to torture in prison, and Tibetans have been detained for religious activities honouring the Dalai Lama [Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader] or possessing his portraits,” the commission said.
Human Rights Watch says the government is also conducting mass DNA collections to better surveil people.
This calamity could soon take an even darker turn — over the disputed succession to the 88-year-old Dalai Lama, free Tibet’s Nobel peace prize-winning face to the world. An unnamed male child, the third-most senior lama and head of the faith in Mongolia, is reportedly in the frame. However, Beijing is vowing to impose its own candidate.
That China is attempting to wipe collective memories and consign the old Tibet to oblivion is not seriously disputed (except by Beijing’s lie machines). China argues its actions are benign, that it has invested heavily there. However, that is driven by its hunger for natural resources. As elsewhere, Xi’s obsession with control, uniformity and conformity trumps all.
By ignoring China’s daily flouting of basic human decency and international law, governments around the world are complicit in Tibet’s silent erasure. None recognizes Tibetans’ sovereign rights or the Tibetan government-in-exile.
So here is a challenge for Cleverly in Beijing. The Chinese, as usual, would take little or no notice of Britain’s views about Russia, fair trade, security and the rest. So why not use your otherwise meaningless visit to publicly condemn China’s crimes against humanity in Tibet?
Your hosts would be angry. They would certainly be embarrassed — but who knows? They might start treating Tibet, and Britain, with a little more respect.
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS