Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) wants it to be known that he believes in the democratic process, and he has made it clear that he has absolutely no concept of conventional party political wisdom. His announcement on Monday of his intention to stand as an independent candidate in next year’s presidential election has left many political commentators scratching their heads, due to the glaring contradiction between his stated purpose and the obvious outcome.
Gou is running against New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential nominee, and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), splitting the vote against Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate.
Gou is framing his campaign as a call for “unity” among the putative “anti-green coalition” of opposition candidates. He is a competent, successful and intelligent man, but his plan to create unity out of division requires monumental effort to understand. It is either brilliant or daft, but nowhere in between.
In his news conference announcing his bid, he said that he is an entrepreneur with nearly five decades of experience, asking: “Who else is better suited to lead Taiwan’s political sphere?” The answer is an experienced politician with proven competence in policymaking and governance — not him.
Perhaps Gou is doubling down on his invitation to Hou and Ko to “have a coffee” and discuss a strategy to bring down the DPP administration, after they rebuffed his earlier invitation. His intention to enter the race only makes sense if he is attempting to get Hou and Ko to take him seriously, and to take him on as a trusted partner with a shared goal, even though he has done so much in the past few weeks to erode that trust. This would only work if he withdraws before the end of the campaign, but all indications are that he wants to see this through to the end. Neither Ko nor Hou stand to gain anything from engaging with him.
Even if this is a genuine attempt to force “unity” in the anti-green alliance, his entry into the field will result in mudslinging among him, Hou and Ko, with none of them emerging untainted. That would only benefit the DPP. Whatever Gou is thinking, he has just injected a fascinating new dynamic into this presidential campaign, and not least for what it says of the rise and fall of the KMT.
After decades as a party-state, followed by a period of two-party politics, Taiwan has waited a long time for a third force to break through. At one point, this might have been the New Power Party, but it has been Ko’s TPP, formed in 2019, that has taken on that mantle. In opinion polls, although not yet in elections, the TPP has all but overtaken the KMT as the DPP’s main rival. Now, Gou is shaking things up further. Are we witnessing the demise of the “century-old party”?
Whatever Gou’s plans for Hou, it is unthinkable that the KMT would let its candidate play second fiddle to a man it has rejected as its own nominee twice. That would be a fall too far. It is astounding that Gou would think it might consider that proposition.
The KMT is clearly rattled by Gou’s announcement, and has said it would discipline any member who offers him support. At the same time, even after the disruption and reneging on his promise to support Hou, the party has said it still hopes Gou might return to the KMT fold. That, too, is astounding.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS