Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has called on Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential nominee, to sit down and have coffee with him.
Likening the three of them to the three little pigs of the children’s fable, their fate threatened by the “big bad wolf” — the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) — Gou said that unless the “anti-green alliance” can sit down and develop a concerted plan, Lai would win next year’s election.
Pan-blue pundits are losing patience with Gou. Former TVBS news anchor Lee Yen-chiou (李艷秋) wrote on Facebook on Tuesday that the “three little pigs” were grinding down voters’ enthusiasm for a transfer of power. She pointed to a poll which showed that, whereas previously 60 percent of voters wanted to see the DPP out of government, the figure had fallen to only 40 percent.
Lee attributed the decline to the three candidates not working to push home the message of why so many voters wanted fresh faces in power.
Lee accused Hou of being weak and Ko of shooting off his mouth, while Gou was throwing around his money and taking aim at people who are supposed to be on his side.
Recent polling had Lai at 43.4 percent compared with Ko’s 26.6 percent and Hou’s 13.6 percent. If Gou’s supporters think the polls lend credence to his urgency for unity among the “three little pigs,” they should heed the words of Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), who told Gou that Ko and Hou polling behind Lai was in no small part due to Gou’s actions. Jaw asked him to either declare his candidacy or announce which candidate he would support.
Why is this still an issue? Why is Gou still prancing in the wings, tossing banana skins and provocations onto the stage while the main acts are attempting to perform? Jaw is right: Gou should stop lobbing bombs at the weak and distracted.
Jaw likened Gou’s “coffee invitation” to the infamous Hongmen feast of Chinese history: For those more familiar with Game of Thrones than ancient Chinese lore, think of the Red Wedding episode.
From his answer to a question during an event in New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋) on Sunday, Gou seems to want to work out a system with Ko and Hou where they talk through their ideas and leave it to the electorate to decide which ideas and which coalition ticket they would prefer. In other words, he is still pushing to be invited to the party and given the best seat at the table.
It sounds like the “Three Little Pigs,” albeit with a twist at the end in which the youngest, weakest of the three turns out to be the Big Bad Wolf in disguise, feigning brotherly affection to wheedle his way in and pounce when the other two are least expecting it.
That would require thwarting those who were seeking an alliance and only makes sense if the ultimate goal is to eliminate them. It is no wonder Jaw talked about the Hongmen feast.
Rather than band together, Gou, Hou and Ko should concentrate on their own campaigns. Ko is trying to, while Hou is not being allowed to by Gou, who has not announced one. They need to let go of each other.
Gou needs to let go first, but Ko and Hou must work harder to shake him off.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US