The presidential candidates of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have both announced their energy policies. It is regrettable that their policies do not address international concerns.
Due to climate change and an energy crisis, the international community is increasingly emphasizing the development of distributed generation, renewable energy and energy flexibility. The KMT and TPP presidential candidates still propose relying on nuclear power. They also suggest reactivating old nuclear power plants. Their outdated thinking is reminiscent of the government’s policy 40 years ago, which focused on developing large-scale generation of electricity at centralized facilities.
In the 1980s, the government opened several nuclear power plants to meet the fast-growing demand for electricity. At the time, the government determined the amount of supply based on the amount of demand, and focused on centralized generation. This policy led to energy rationing in certain regions.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs allowed the private sector to establish independent power producers to generate electricity for sale between 1995 and 1999. These independent power producers have provided 19 percent of the nation’s annual electricity consumption, showing that the best solution for power system instability lies in investment in the private sector.
After four decades, due to the Renewable Energy 100 project and the goal of reaching net zero emissions, Taiwan’s demand for electricity has been coupled with the development of green energy. It is not that Taiwan has failed to generate enough power. The major problem is that it does not have enough green energy.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co thought about building its own renewable energy power system, but chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) concluded that it was “way too complicated.” Liu’s comment demonstrated how many hurdles a private company needs to overcome to develop green energy for its own use.
The next government must outline policies and agendas that would encourage corporations to invest in improving the nation’s green energy systems. Companies that need to rely on green energy can be both the manufacturer and the consumer, and hence the burden of green power generation can be distributed more equally.
The government has failed to achieve its goals in terms of green energy development. One reason is that the ruling party’s policy has been too dependent on state-run Taiwan Power Co, which has monopolized the energy market for some time.
The US government has introduced energy tax credits, an incentive that reduces the cost for people and businesses to use alternative energy sources. The purpose is to encourage corporations to develop green energy and be self-reliant. As long as a business has established solar power facilities or invested in photovoltaic projects, it can claim tax deductions in proportion to either the investment or the amount of electricity generated.
Such a measure is worth considering. The government must offer more economic incentives for Taiwanese businesses.
Greenpeace Taiwan hopes that the presidential candidates will offer new energy policies that are more original and pioneering. Through policy subsidies, incentives and collaboration, the government must help firms transform from consumers of green energy to producers, so that they can achieve the goal of “self-generation and self-consumption.”
The government, businesses and wider society would then be able to work together and help Taiwan solve the problem of renewable energy development.
Chen Yung-jen is climate and energy project manager at Greenpeace East Asia..
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS