Beijing on Aug. 10 announced the third group of nations that Chinese tour groups can visit, with Taiwan conspicuously absent from the list, in one more attempt at economic coercion that is likely designed to affect next year’s presidential election.
As part of its reopening to the world in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, China since February has released three lists of target destinations for tour groups, which covers 138 nations, but Taiwan, a model nation for pandemic controls, was consistently excluded.
Beijing, which has banned independent Chinese tourists from Taiwan since August 2019 and group travel since 2020, has shown no intention to resume cross-strait travel. Taiwan, on the other hand, allows individuals to travel to China and the government has conveyed Taiwan’s goodwill in reopening group tours across the Taiwan Strait.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) on May 8 said that Chinese travel agencies would be allowed to resume business involving Taiwanese tourist groups, but remained silent about lifting ban on Chinese traveling to Taiwan or resuming talks.
Minister of Transportation and Communications Wang Kwo-tsai (王國材) said that Taiwan and China must mutually show goodwill before normal cross-strait tourism could resume. The regulations on cross-strait group travel should also be negotiated through existing channels, such as the tourism associations in Taiwan and China, to ensure that cross-strait travel is reinstated reciprocally.
Beijing has long used tourists as tools of economic coercion to suppress democratic nations. In addition to limiting Chinese tourists to Taiwan after President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was elected in 2016, China once banned its tourists from traveling to South Korea due to Beijing’s discontent at Seoul’s deployment of the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system.
China has obviously again taken Taiwan’s presidential election into consideration in not allowing Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan, aiming to hinder the campaign of Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate, who leads in the polls.
However, instead of blaming China for banning travel to Taiwan, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and some travel agencies speciously accused Tsai and the government of not showing enough goodwill to Beijing, and suggested that Taiwan should extend an olive branch by sending Taiwanese tour groups to China.
They seem to have deliberately ignored some bitter lessons learned from previous cross-strait exchanges, specifically that there used to be a tourist deficit across the Strait, with more Taiwanese traveling and spending money in China than Chinese tourists in Taiwan. In 2014 and 2015, while then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT encouraged cross-strait travel, 2.8 million Chinese — 4.1 million at the peak — were traveling annually to Taiwan, significantly fewer than the more than 5 million Taiwanese traveling to China.
Many tourism operators also complained that the China-oriented tourism sector had long been dominated by Chinese “one dragon” firms, which monopolize the transportation, accommodation, meals and shopping itineraries of Chinese tour groups to keep most of the expenditure in China.
Another phenomenon is that although international tourist levels have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels, domestic hotel rates in Taiwan hit a record high last year, which has driven more Taiwanese to travel abroad.
Taiwan welcomes tourism exchanges with all nations, including China, but communication should be both ways. The government should be wary of an inappropriate reopening of travel across the Strait, which would worsen the tourism deficit, and sabotage the tourism market and quality in Taiwan.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS