Democratic Taiwan is beginning to heat up in preparation for next January’s presidential and legislative elections. These tend to be raucous and hotly contested. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will step down in the spring after serving the constitutionally permitted two terms, which featured significant advances in the island’s democratic system as well as the growth and diversification of its overall economy.
Having lived and worked in Taiwan five times over the past fifty years, I have been privileged to observe some of these changes up close. In my humble opinion, Taiwan remains one of the most dynamic economies in the world, with a current GDP of over $760 billion USD. This is expected to near a trillion USD by the end of the decade. This growth is anchored by its high-tech sector, whose centerpiece is semiconductor giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Many other thriving companies, such as Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry), and Giant Bicycles, have robust global markets competitive with the best of the best. Not bad for a population of 23 million citizens with relatively few rich natural resources to tap into. In no small part this is due to Taiwan’s impressive army of technology-savvy engineers and managers. A surprising number of them have pursued advanced studies in the United States and other highly-developed nations.
The early favorite in the upcoming presidential election is Vice President William Lai (賴清德), a longstanding leader in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) who seems set to carry the DPP standard. The rival Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has struggled recently to compete in national elections, hampered by its tendency to seek closer political ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has some sway as the party’s senior spokesman, but his recent trip to the mainland probably soured many observers, including within the KMT, by suggesting a desire to grow too close to the mainland behemoth.
We can be certain that the mainland will be watching events closely and hoping for a KMT victory to push the DPP back into opposition. Chinese leader Xi Jinping (習近平) has made no secret of his ambition to absorb Taiwan into its political orbit, though that remains a fraught and contested objective with many East Asian neighbors.
As a side note, I would observe that the People’s Republic of China has had tumultuous relations with most of its neighbors, including Japan, India, Vietnam, Mongolia and much of Central Asia. History has shown that China harbors an almost unlimited appetite for expansion whenever the opportunity appears. Taiwan is just one of the objects of its attention, though it is fair to say this is the most prominent goal of Mr. Xi. Though no fan of the authoritarian chieftain of China, since he insists that he must resolve the Taiwan issue in his lifetime, I can only hope that his lifetime lasts a while.
I had the privilege of visiting my favorite island with a Global Taiwan Institute (GTI) delegation this spring, during which we met many of the leading political figures on both sides of the political spectrum. Our group was treated to a relaxed and lengthy dinner with President Tsai at her residence, and Vice President Lai was one of the guests of honor. We also met KMT leader Eric Chu (朱立倫) for a productive exchange of views. Eric has long impressed me for breaking the mold of lawyer-candidates, which seems to have been the pattern of most candidates for the top job.
One thing is certain. The campaign will be vigorous and hard-fought. It most likely will be decided by a very narrow margin. Democratic friends around the world will watch with great interest to see how the election plays out. The fate of the Legislative Yuan will also be decided. A president who lacks a majority in the legislature will face significant difficulty advancing his party’s platform. So much is at stake.
Vice President Lai recently visited Latin America and made a couple of stopovers in the US on his way there and back. This is a longtime tradition. Lai even visited the greater Washington DC area and saw friends there both in and out of government. He also visited New York and San Francisco.
While the results of these pivotal elections will largely reflect political and economic concerns of the Taiwan electorate, they will also be closely watched by the US, the PRC, and neighboring countries like Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam, India and South Korea. Most of Taiwan’s neighbors remain alarmed by Beijing’s assertive claims to both territorial seas and their own borders.
I also note that TECRO’s current representative in Washington, the estimable Bi-khim Hsiao (蕭美琴), is being discussed as a possible running mate with Lai. I have known Bi-khim for over twenty-five years and have the greatest respect for her. She has distinguished herself in the hothouse of Washington politics and would be an excellent member of the DPP’s leadership if selected. Moscow would do well to study Taiwan’s model of vibrant democracy and impressive use of its skilled and hardworking people to build a modern economy amidst difficult regional circumstances.
One thing is certain. Taiwan’s steady development as a stable young democracy, buttressed by strong economic growth, will continue to play an active and positive force in East Asia as well as the global economy. The plucky island state can also count on the steady support of the United States as it heads into these elections and the path beyond.
We can only hope that China will assume a realistic approach to cross-strait relations. If not, it will find itself isolated from most of its neighbors. It cannot count on much support from Putin’s Russia, mired as it is in an ugly and totally unjustified war against Ukraine. Russia’s economy is floundering; it will not be able to offset the global opprobrium it now faces, so long as it continues to threaten its neighbors and flout global standards of decent behavior. One wonders how long the Russian people will tolerate Mr. Putin’s shameful behavior on the regional and global stage.
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea