There were 2,990 people killed in traffic accidents in 2021, a mortality rate of 0.000124, which is five times higher than in many other countries. Taiwan has been called “a living hell for pedestrians” in a Facebook post.
Today, civic group Vision Zero is to host a march on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei, calling on the government to “return the road to the people.” The idea of Vision Zero originated from the Swedish government’s “Nollvision” launched in 1997, which holds that pedestrians should be regarded as the main subject of transportation (ie, roads are for pedestrians, not cars), and drivers should be taken as the cause of all traffic accidents. Therefore, drivers should be responsible for everything, and they should be trained rigorously.
Over the past two decades, many countries have emphasized that all roads should be more “pedestrian-oriented.” Governments in Japan, Australia, Europe and the US all suggested that the improvement of road planning should be valued more than law enforcement.
However, no matter how much enforcement is done, people would break the rules. In Taiwan, drivers and pedestrians often do not abide by traffic rules.
Traffic researchers found that it would be easier for the government to implement traffic measures after the public has formed a consensus on safety. In addition to law enforcement, it is most important to re-examine road designs. Work could be done to increase the distance between sidewalks and roads, establish pedestrian refuge islands and reduce the length of sidewalks. To have cars slow down at intersections, the areas for driving and the size of lanes can be reduced, and roundabouts can be set up to replace traffic lights. The purpose is to make driving more inconvenient, so that drivers would rather not drive. It used to be believed that traffic congestion should be criticized and that the government should do more to solve the problem, but today, traffic congestion can be considered as a way to prevent more cars from running on the roads. This is an innovative concept worth thinking about. After all, pedestrians’ lives should never be sacrificed only to save a few minutes journey time for a handful of people.
The fundamental problem of Taiwan’s traffic is that the government is not enforcing the rules and members of the public do not abide by the road laws. In the past two months, the situation has greatly improved to the extent that the intersections do not need to be renovated. As long as drivers are “forced” to follow the rules and stop at crosswalks to yield the right of way to pedestrians, Taiwan would no longer be a living hell for pedestrians.
Vision Zero should advocate that pedestrians and drivers are not to be set against each other, promoting the idea that both are on the same side. Many pedestrians have never become drivers, but it is impossible for a driver to sit in a car for the rest of their life. A driver can become a pedestrian at any time and hence needs to be protected by rules. In this sense, “return the roads to the people” is not only for the sake of the pedestrians, but for everyone. Even if people rely a lot on cars and scooters, drivers should maintain their dignity as human beings.
It is hoped that Vision Zero would keep urging local governments to penalize drivers who fail to stop before intersections. This is the first step to solve the traffic problems in Taiwan. All driving lessons should also be required to instruct drivers to be vigilant and stop before crosswalks, and motor vehicle offices should not let anyone get a license if the person fails to stop at intersections.
Jeremy Wang is a physician and a founding director of the Taiwan Association of Family Medicine.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS