An outsider candidate for Argentina’s presidency is gaining traction by tapping into voter anger at rampant inflation.
With no sign of relief in sight, Javier Milei, an economist-turned-lawmaker best known for his combative television appearances, senses an opening for his brand of rage-filled rhetoric. An acolyte of former US president Donald Trump with a reputation for political theatrics over policy specifics, pollsters say his challenge needs to be taken seriously going into October’s elections.
One reason is that Argentina’s deeply polarized political class is in crisis, with the ruling Peronist coalition and the main opposition each in disarray and still to identify a respective presidential candidate, but Milei’s real bonus is that neither of the established blocs, populist or pro-market, has been able to fix an economy lurching deeper into the abyss.
“Obviously, as inflation goes up, more people intend to vote for me,” Milei, 52, said in an interview in Buenos Aires in February.
Milei’s blow-up-the-system message is calibrated to resonate in times like these, and the relentless stream of bad economic news is running in his favor. Annual inflation in March surpassed 100 percent for the first time since the early 1990s, bringing back memories of the hyperinflation that ravaged South America’s second-largest economy.
With nearly 40 percent of the population mired in poverty, Milei casts himself as a savior in a “moral revolution.” His responses to the malaise are correspondingly dramatic, and include swapping the Argentine peso for the US dollar as a national currency and slashing government spending. He has even suggested burning down the central bank.
It is all part of his aggressive style of politics, which he says crystallized when he attracted blanket criticism for his conservative views: “I realized the only way is to fight.”
It is an approach that appears to be winning over Argentines.
More than 31 percent of voters have a positive image of Milei, who scores higher than Argentine President Alberto Fernandez or any other potential Peronist candidate, a February poll by consulting firm Management & Fit in Buenos Aires found.
Milei’s positive rating is in a dead heat with one opposition candidate, Buenos Aires Mayor Horacio Rodriguez Larreta, and trails only former Argentine minister of security Patricia Bullrich.
Although polls were notoriously off in the 2019 presidential race, nobody doubts that Milei is taking votes from both coalitions, whose respective bases have until now been untouched.
Milei “reflects the failure of Argentina’s political class,” said Julio Barbaro, a former Peronist lawmaker. “He expresses voters’ anger.”
Milei is aware that economic turbulence is his runway for takeoff. Argentina has spent more time in recession than any other nation since World War II with the sole exception of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, World Bank data shows. Another is looming this year, as an historic drought destroys crop harvests that are essential to bring in US dollars for government coffers and to fuel growth.
Monica Troncoso, 46, remembers past looting and anarchy during hyperinflation, and says Argentina is close to a return to those days. Living in poverty, working multiple jobs and in receipt of welfare, Troncoso sees a “social explosion” unless Argentina takes a turn for the better soon.
She worries that could create the conditions for a Milei upset. She has already witnessed his electoral potential, living in the poor Barrio Fatima area of Buenos Aires where he recorded his best performance in the 2021 midterm elections, a result that helped catapult him into Congress.
“I’m afraid there could be some type of breaking point and that people accept Milei as their leader,” said Troncoso, who described her politics as “very left,” but said she is still to decide whom to back this year. “The one who creates more chaos will reign.”
Milei sees his voter base as strongest in Argentina’s largely poor northern provinces rather than merely the wealthy farm belt and the capital, and he is gaining ground in areas where the Peronists, the dominant political force of the past 70 years, have long held sway.
His election strategy is not complicated: Make it to the second round and light the fuse.
“If we get to a runoff, we’ll win,” he said. “It doesn’t matter who our rival is.”
Born and raised in Buenos Aires, Milei climbed the corporate ladder, serving as senior economist in Argentina for HSBC and other firms before becoming an adviser at Corporacion America, the holding firm run by billionaire Eduardo Eurnekian, and appearing at Davos.
At first he penned mild-mannered analysis and opinion columns, then he was invited on television as a conservative pundit. After the 2019 election that returned a divisive Peronist coalition, he started appearing more frequently on talk shows, where his furious exchanges with left-wing pundits went viral. His talks soon went from hushed hotels to rockstar-style rallies.
Despite his growing fan base, Milei faces mounting resistance for overstepping the mark. As president, he would eliminate the newly created Argentine Ministry of Women, Genders and Diversity, and a government-run institution advocating against racism. He said he would move to eliminate Argentina’s abortion laws because he considers the act murder.
His poll numbers dipped last year after he expressed support for the sale of human organs and loosening regulations on gun purchases in a nation largely devoid of household firearms.
Milei has few political allies, describing politicians as delinquents, thieves and criminals for mismanaging the economy. He considers the government printing money to finance spending a crime — it is not — and casts a narrative of political leaders enamored with high inflation.
To dollarize the economy, he suggests pushing through a type of referendum that does not require congressional approval and said he would prosecute any lawmaker who did not abide by the result.
Without having announced all the candidates on his ticket for governor, senate or house, questions remain over how much national reach he would have.
Single with no children and never married, Milei has five dogs, four named after economists. He says his image — sideburns, disheveled hair, frowning in photographs — is natural. If so, it is meticulously crafted. His makeup artist carefully whisks his hair into dramatic form. He gives instructions on how to photograph him. Milei insists he cannot go on a dinner date partly because “120 people would come and ask me for selfies.”
Cinthia Fernandez, a single mother from the low-income town of La Matanza south of the capital, asked for one such selfie. She hugged Milei at his campaign headquarters in February as he raffled off his congressional salary, a monthly publicity stunt. His tough-on-crime and corruption message resonated with Fernandez, whose hometown is known for its poverty.
“My president,” she said as the two embraced.
Whether he takes the top job or not, Milei’s support shows that as much of Latin America from Colombia to Brazil has shifted left, Argentina is tacking right. Even the Fernandez government, facing approval ratings in the teens, is starting to implement Washington consensus policies, such as budget cuts and high interest rates to comply with a US$44 billion program with the IMF.
For ordinary voters, Fernandez’s shift from populism to austerity has not delivered economic results. Nor did his business-friendly predecessor, former Argentine president Mauricio Macri, whose opposition party might run multiple candidates this year.
Argentine Vice President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who governed for two terms before Macri, also left a trail of economic distress.
Milei’s greatest appeal might be that he is not a part of that political class.
Juan Germano, director of polling firm Isonomia in Buenos Aires, said Milei stands to win political power and seats in Congress even if he does not take the presidency, and that could impact all of Argentina.
A Milei with 5 percent of the vote “isn’t a big deal,” while 10 percent support “is a problem for the opposition coalition,” Germano said. “A Milei with 15 percent of votes is a problem for everybody.”
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS