On Saturday, a graffitied wall along London’s Brick Lane was whitewashed and daubed with the Chinese characters for the 12 “core socialist values” promoted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The stark red words in simplified Chinese on the whitewashed background served as a perfect metaphor for the CCP’s approach — which is not to allow any room for dissent or diversity while promoting a simplistic, ideological code that bears little resemblance to how it actually governs China.
It is unclear what residents and visitors who do not read Chinese thought of it: They might have seen it mainly as an unwanted intrusion from overseas by propaganda that rudely covered up original artwork.
The work was carried out by a group of Chinese students. One member said that the slogans “did not carry a strong political message,” which seems disingenuous, because they clearly do, within the context of their presence in the UK’s capital or as propaganda splayed throughout communist China.
However, a statement by the group said it was an “adamant display of freedom of expression ... the characters stand as a silent reminder of the oppression of thought, press freedom and to free speech that is still rampant in China in 2023,” apparently contradicting the position of the aforementioned member.
By the end of the weekend, the local council had erased the words, together with the comments that people had added.
Whatever one thinks about the manner in which it was done, or what the original intent of the group of artists was, as a piece of installation art it was brilliant, because of the conversation it elicited and that it was done on a platform the CCP authorities could not trace. It is a shame the local council did not leave it up for a few more days.
If nothing else, the conversation allowed for scrutiny of the CCP’s supposed “core socialist values.” To the characters for “patriotism” (愛國), someone added the prefix “fake/hypocritical” (偽) and the suffix “does not love me” (不愛我), turning the message into: “I fake my love for my country because my country does not love me.”
The characters “rule of law” (法治) were also modified to “fake rule of law” (偽法治), and the lower right quadrant of the final character was pierced by a question mark, as if questioning whether the claim of rule of law in communist China was legitimate.
The character for “fake/hypocritical” appeared next to many of the “core socialist values.”
By “equality” (平等) somebody had written, in English, “but some are more equal than others,” a reference to George Orwell’s Animal Farm. By “justice” (公正), a “no” (不) was added, making it “no justice.” Next to this there was a sticker showing a Hong Kong protester with the slogan “Stay strong Hong Kong,” while other stickers showed a cartoon of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), looking remarkably similar to Winnie the Pooh, annotated with the legend “Jinpingie the Pooh,” and another with Xi above the text “Free re-education camps,” a satirical reference to the Uighur concentration camps.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) often talks about shared values aligning Taiwan with like-minded democracies in opposition to autocratic regimes, and there is little to dislike about the listed values: Who would find fault with prosperity, democracy, civilization, harmony, freedom, equality, justice, rule of law, patriotism, dedication, integrity and friendliness? It is just that, as the Brick Lane commentators so eloquently pointed out, the CCP’s adherence to most of these values is a lie.
Maybe this artwork would work admirably on the streets of Taipei, where it is far more relevant than in London, and especially during a presidential election campaign, when, as always, China looms large.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS