Lest you think air travel could not possibly get more miserable, climate change is here to prove you wrong.
Just as extreme heat makes people sluggish and unproductive at best, and threatens human life at worst, it also makes flying airplanes much more difficult. Hot air is less dense than cold air, its molecules zipping around at higher speeds, meaning planes have less lift when the mercury rises. That makes it harder for them to take off and stay aloft.
Airlines and pilots are likely to often choose to delay flights or unload passengers and luggage to shed weight from planes when the temperature climbs too high. This leads to cascading schedule disruptions across the entire system, along with passengers occasionally being trapped for hours on runways inside roasting aircraft.
It is a problem that is expected to only get worse as the planet warms and extreme heat of the sort blanketing the southern US this summer becomes more routine.
Up to 30 percent of all US flights, on average, might be subject to weight restrictions during periods of high heat by 2050, a 2017 Columbia University study says.
Barring a miraculous technological breakthrough, the aerospace industry has no real solution to overcome the harsh laws of physics.“This is a physical restriction related to air density and there are not a whole lot of direct technological fixes for it,” said Ethan Coffel, an assistant professor at Syracuse University, who was an author of the 2017 study.
Most of us probably think of snow and ice as the biggest threat to on-time flights, but heat causes far more delays, Bloomberg News reported recently.
Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport, for example, had roughly twice as many weather delays in the summer of last year than it did last winter.
The high-heat problem is especially hard to overcome for airports with short runways, which give planes less room to gain the momentum they need to take off. New York’s LaGuardia Airport has a particularly short runway and no space to expand, constrained as it is by Flushing Bay and dense Queens neighborhoods.
Unfortunately for Americans’ mental health, LaGuardia is also what the Federal Aviation Administration calls a “pacing airport,” or one that has a high volume of traffic; it is routinely unable to handle that volume of traffic, and ruins air schedules around the country as a result.
“Scheduling is a disaster every day as it is, and heat just makes it worse,” independent aviation consultant Robert Mann said.
Airports at high altitudes, such as Denver, are also uniquely vulnerable to high heat, as are the ever-warming cities of the US’ Sun Belt. Surprisingly, the hottest of those cities, Phoenix, suffers relatively few weight-restriction days thanks to its longer-than-usual runways, which are also made of specially reinforced concrete.
Of course, not every airport can afford the expense and delay of tearing up old runways and building new, stronger ones. Cancellations still happen, even in Phoenix.
Workers on sun-baked taxiways and runways — which are usually much hotter than the atmosphere around the airport — are also especially vulnerable to the “heat island” effect. Workers in extreme conditions would need longer breaks or risk falling ill, causing airports to be short-staffed.
Aerospace manufacturers are always working on ways to make planes lighter and more efficient, but most of that progress has already been made. Barring revolutionary new materials, any further gains would be incremental at best. So, until humanity figures out how to make airplanes out of gossamer, old-fashioned solutions to heat must be relied upon: moving flights to cooler times, lengthening and strengthening runways and ditching weight.
The net effect is that flight delays are likely to keep rising, adding to climate change’s growing impact on air travel. It is already making turbulence more dangerous, lengthening flights because of changing wind patterns and fueling the extreme weather that leads to more delays.
As with every other effect of rising heat, the most effective solution would be to stop burning the fossil fuels that contribute to warming — including the fuels burned by airplanes. Air travel is not much fun these days anyway.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. A former managing editor of Fortune.com, he ran the HuffPost’s business and technology coverage and was a reporter and editor for the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
With assistance from Brooke Sutherland.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS