Great power competition is expected to only continue to increase frictions along geopolitical fault lines. Caught between China and the US, no other regional organization recognizes this more acutely than ASEAN. Concerns have been raised as to how the organization representing 650 million people is expected to navigate the tense waters of this strategic region as the frequency of crises becomes more recurrent.
Singapore Institute of International Affairs chairman Simon Tay (戴尚志), during his opening address for the 15th ASEAN & Asia Forum, said that the world was heading into a “concrisis,” a convergence of crises and global issues.
VISION
The concept of “ASEAN centrality” has been championed by the organization to maintain cohesion and identify the interests that external powers have in the region. Holding this year’s chairmanship, Indonesia has expressed its vision of ASEAN as the “epicentrum of growth.” Jakarta aims to “strengthen economic recovery and make Southeast Asia the world’s engine of sustainable growth.”
However, climate change, inequality and the breakdown of multilateralism pose existential and persistent challenges to the region.
“ASEAN centrality is not a panacea,” ASEAN Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn said, but it is something that can be used to help deal with current and upcoming challenges. Kao said that ASEAN cannot afford to take sides or pay lip service to the great powers.
CRISIS MANAGEMENT
The problem remains that external powers might misunderstand the interests of ASEAN states. Former Vietnamese deputy minister of foreign affairs and former ambassador to the US Pham Quang Vinh said that when approached by Washington to join the Administration of US President Joe Biden’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity, the Vietnamese government was initially reluctant, as it was concerned about how China would react toward it.
In the past years, ASEAN has been tested internally and externally. The 2021 military coup in Myanmar has revealed the organization’s limitations in resolving the crisis, as “non-interference” is a fundamental principle of the organization. China’s growing influence in member states such as Cambodia also weakened ASEAN’s solidarity when the organization failed to issue a joint statement on the South China Sea when Phnom Penh refused to mention the issue.
DIALOGUE
Despite the challenges that Southeast Asian nations face, ASEAN continues to matter as it remains the key platform for regional cooperation. At the recent 56th ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Jakarta, the organization’s 11 key dialogue partners, including the US, China and Russia, were in attendance.
That states locked in confrontation could congregate under ASEAN’s auspices demonstrates the organization’s significance at a time when the prospect of engagement between belligerent great powers continues to fade.
Until a new equilibrium in international politics is achieved and solutions to our collective existential threats are found, crisis is expected to continue to define the decades ahead of us.
In the forum’s final keynote speech, Singaporean Minister of Health Ong Ye Kung (王乙康) gave his definition of crises: “They are painful and destructive, but they pass.”
Nigel Li is a specialist on Eurasia and Russian foreign policy. He reports from Singapore.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS