In a city that is constantly changing, some residents are pushing back.
Plans to redevelop Jingu Gaien, a century-old park and sports center in central Tokyo, have met with stiff opposition from concerned citizens. In one of his final acts before his death in March, composer Ryuichi Sakamoto wrote to the governor opposing it.
Haruki Murakami, Japan’s most famous novelist, has spoken out against it, warning “once something is destroyed, it can never be restored.”
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The 1.31km2 area is home to the Yakult Swallows baseball team, the city’s rugby pitch and about 2,000 trees, most notably a 300m row of gingko trees that is an unmistakable Tokyo landmark. In a joint project between Mitsui Fudosan Co, Itochu Corp, the Japan Sports Council and the landowners of Meiji Shrine, the project envisions knocking down and rebuilding the baseball and rugby pitches, switching their locations and constructing two new skyscrapers, along with communal spaces.
Opponents who want to preserve the site are livid, accusing the developers of putting profit ahead of residents. The backlash has made international headlines, perhaps because it feeds into narratives of a concrete-covered Japan. Most resistance has focused on the 700 trees that would be felled for the redevelopment.
First, some facts: The famous row of trees (which is what most people envision when they think of the vegetation there) would be preserved in its current form, though activists worry about potential damage to their roots. While some others would be cut down, the developers have pledged to increase the total to 1,998 by the end of the project by transplanting some and adding newer ones. The entire amount of green space would increase to 30 percent from the current 25 percent. So why the uproar? Chopping trees creates an emotional narrative, especially in a city going through a recent heatwave. Tokyo could use more greenery to combat the heat-island effect, so even a temporary loss feels concerning. Some of it stems from a perceived lack of consultation, particularly with those who do not live in the area. The developers’ move to share more information feels a little belated and needs to continue throughout the construction, but part of it also seems to stem from opposition to any change. As the city ages, or maybe just due to social media impact, redevelopment plans appear to be attracting foes. It seems these days that every aging building is sparking a campaign to save it.
However, the capital’s one constant is its never-ending change. If New York is the city that never sleeps, then Tokyo is the city that never stays the same.
“In Japan, there is less a culture of preserving old buildings,” the world-famous architect Tadao Ando said in 2006. “Japanese architecture is traditionally based on wooden structures that need renovating on a regular basis. Of course, we have since adopted concrete, steel and other durable materials, so the need to rebuild is no longer the same. But old habits die hard.”
Ando’s work is a great example. He was speaking then of the Doujunkai Aoyama Apartments, a block of modernist dwellings built in the 1920s and demolished in 2003 to make way for Ando’s Omotesando Hills mall. Opposed at the time, it is now seen as a signature work by one of the country’s great designers, and has become a crucial element in converting Omotesando into what it is now famous for — an elegant area where high-end shopping and architecture meet, such as New York’s Fifth Avenue or London’s Bond Street.
It is this lack of sentimentality and attachment to the past that has made Tokyo the world’s greatest city, or at least the most functional. Western visitors arriving post-COVID-19 pandemic are stunned to see how the city just ... works. No housing crisis or rental market inflation. Public transport is so functional that a stoppage on Monday on the capital’s key train line was the country’s top news story.
Ando explained that what was most important “was to save not the building itself, but the impression it made on the landscape.”
Tokyo’s best redevelopments do just that. Cries went up in 2015 over the redevelopment of the Hotel Okura; few complain anymore, as the new hotel is not only gorgeous, but keeps the feel of the original’s lobby, famously featured in a James Bond novel. In the 2000s, there was an outcry over the overhaul of the Shimokitazawa area; that has been a success, only improving on the area’s hipster charm. Disapproval would likely happen when the Imperial Hotel is torn down and rebuilt, beginning next year. (US architect Frank Lloyd Wright famously designed an earlier incarnation of the hotel before it was demolished in the late 1960s and replaced with the current version.)
Others mourn the loss of an iconic baseball field where Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig once played, worrying the change would drive fans away. The fears seem overblown. I lived in Hiroshima during the last years of the Hiroshima Carp’s beloved Municipal Stadium, located near the city’s famous Peace Park, before it was replaced by a new stadium elsewhere in the city. There was much upset then too, but the results are clear: Not only has the surrounding area been transformed, but average attendance at games has nearly doubled despite the stadiums having similar capacity. The Swallows’ ground is not without its charms, but it requires considerable modernization. Fitting with Ando’s philosophy, designs for the new stadium show they would preserve the feel of the existing facility, rather than creating a roofed field that would likely be more profitable.
Parts of the Jingu development do not seem perfect: I question the choice of an all-weather covered rugby stadium, even if it would become a venue for concerts, and I will mourn the loss of the grungy public batting center, which is not being replaced.
Residents being involved in these discussions is a good thing, but people should not veer from keeping developers honest to the not-in-my back-yard provincialism that has paralyzed so many Western cities, so rooted in the past they are unable to move into the present — think of the planning concerns that have choked homebuilding in the UK and elsewhere, even amid a housing crisis. Nor should people fall victim to the narrative of an inevitable decline — the idea that because of its aging and decreasing population Japan needs no more buildings: New places, ideas and even areas create an energy that refutes this assumption. Tokyo’s stock of incredible buildings and world-class public transport are only possible precisely because of its commitment to constant rebirth. Its beauty lies in the fact that it is ever-changing.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —