As a tennis fan who also plays the sport, this year’s Wimbledon gave me an unforgettable championship night. While the world focused on the rise of the new king of men’s tennis and a changing of the guard from the “Big Three,” Taiwan’s Hsieh Su-wei’s (謝淑薇) unprecedented success in the women’s doubles failed to attract the attention it deserves. That is perhaps the destiny of her tennis family.
Hsieh has won six Grand Slam women’s doubles titles, including back-to-back titles at the French Open and Wimbledon this year since her comeback at the age of 36. This is not only a milestone for Taiwanese tennis, it is in itself a remarkable personal achievement.
Although people congratulated Hsieh for her world-class achievement, many focused on disputes between the Hsieh family and the family of Taiwanese player Latisha Chan (詹詠然).
I feel sorry for Hsieh’s situation. Although she concentrates on women’s doubles rather than singles, she would have become famous and more successful had she secured more commercial sponsorships in other countries where the sport is well developed. One might wonder why the world-class athlete does not have any commercial support from Taiwanese companies.
When Hsieh first started her rise in tennis 20 years ago, I happened to be doing field research in the sport. At that time, I witnessed the strict training of her father, Hsieh Tzu-lung (謝子龍), which helped her to gradually make a name for herself in international tennis.
Meanwhile, Chan moved from Taichung to Taipei to join coach Chen Nan (陳南), which laid the foundation for her to go international. Originally, the country’s best two players could have gone international together for greater success. In the end, they have gone their separate ways, and disputes between the tennis families often appear in the media.
When Hsieh Su-wei won Wimbledon again, Taiwan should have celebrated her victory. Instead, Taiwanese entered another debate over past entanglements, forgetting that such a wonderful championship night belonged not only to her family, but also to Taiwanese tennis. What a pity.
After Taiwan hosted the 2017 Summer Universiade, which was renamed the World University Games in 2020, public attention on some local athletes finally earned them sponsorship deals. With the push of the Tokyo Olympics in 2021, commercial sponsorships of top athletes paid more than the prize money or government subsidies, as Taiwan turned into a developed sports country.
Hsieh Su-wei, a six-time Grand Slam champion, has never seen commercial support from Taiwanese companies.
Have all the past controversies scared commercial sponsors away? If not, why is the former world No. 1 in women’s doubles not favored by local businesses? After all, the feud between them over the past two decades might be a result of a variety of conflicts that have arisen from the imperfect sports system itself.
Today, Hsieh Su-wei is 37, and she probably only has a few years of competitive tennis ahead of her. It is hoped that in the near future, she can make Taiwanese proud by taking home yet another Grand Slam title in clothing bearing Taiwanese logos. We should also thank Hsieh Su-wei and her family for leading Taiwan to the top of the tennis world, and are looking forward to seeing her lift a Grand Slam trophy again.
Lee Chia-yao is a professor at National Taipei University of Education’s Department of Physical Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS