Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and former legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) have promised to attend a housing justice and judicial reform rally on Sunday on Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei.
It is ironic that the four men are to attend a rally to protest housing unaffordability.
Gou is one of the richest people in Taiwan; Ko was the mayor of the most unaffordable city in terms of housing prices; while Hou and Huang have large real-estate holdings.
Hou ’s 103 studios close to Chinese Culture University in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) have earned him a lot of money in rent. For each studio, Hou can charge NT$16,000 (US$512) per month, which means he can bring in more than NT$1.6 million per month without doing any work. Huang’s family owns 15 plots of land and eight properties totaling 6,650m2. Huang says they are small plots of land for growing vegetables.
However, one of the plots has been converted into a parking lot, from which the family is estimated to be earning NT$60,000 to NT$70,000 per month.
Seeing this band of four at the rally is likely to trigger outrage at their supposed “support” of housing justice. Their participation is a ploy to gain recognition they do not deserve. They are like mafiosas protesting how bad social security is. In China, they would be described as “waving the red flag against the red flag.”
Some analogies might help describe their involvement:
Some Chinese people drive their beloved Japanese vehicles while they join Beijing-endorsed rallies against Japanese products; the director of a Chinese national Buddhist association sexually abused female disciples, practicing Buddhism and sexual assault at the same time; corrupt Chinese officials enter government agencies with cash in their hands, demonstrating the hypocrisy of Chinese officialdom and bureaucracy.
This kind of person proves that corruption would not be opposed seriously and would not be fought on a large scale.
Are Gou, Ko, Hou and Huang like this? They know that housing justice should be supported, but would they support it seriously? Would they back a large-scale effort to address it?
The realization of housing justice would shatter their lives.
It remains to be seen what this band of four would do for ordinary people. Nothing can be hidden from discerning eyes.
Yu Kung is a Taiwanese entrepreneur working in China.
Translated by Emma Liu
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS