Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and former legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) have promised to attend a housing justice and judicial reform rally on Sunday on Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei.
It is ironic that the four men are to attend a rally to protest housing unaffordability.
Gou is one of the richest people in Taiwan; Ko was the mayor of the most unaffordable city in terms of housing prices; while Hou and Huang have large real-estate holdings.
Hou ’s 103 studios close to Chinese Culture University in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) have earned him a lot of money in rent. For each studio, Hou can charge NT$16,000 (US$512) per month, which means he can bring in more than NT$1.6 million per month without doing any work. Huang’s family owns 15 plots of land and eight properties totaling 6,650m2. Huang says they are small plots of land for growing vegetables.
However, one of the plots has been converted into a parking lot, from which the family is estimated to be earning NT$60,000 to NT$70,000 per month.
Seeing this band of four at the rally is likely to trigger outrage at their supposed “support” of housing justice. Their participation is a ploy to gain recognition they do not deserve. They are like mafiosas protesting how bad social security is. In China, they would be described as “waving the red flag against the red flag.”
Some analogies might help describe their involvement:
Some Chinese people drive their beloved Japanese vehicles while they join Beijing-endorsed rallies against Japanese products; the director of a Chinese national Buddhist association sexually abused female disciples, practicing Buddhism and sexual assault at the same time; corrupt Chinese officials enter government agencies with cash in their hands, demonstrating the hypocrisy of Chinese officialdom and bureaucracy.
This kind of person proves that corruption would not be opposed seriously and would not be fought on a large scale.
Are Gou, Ko, Hou and Huang like this? They know that housing justice should be supported, but would they support it seriously? Would they back a large-scale effort to address it?
The realization of housing justice would shatter their lives.
It remains to be seen what this band of four would do for ordinary people. Nothing can be hidden from discerning eyes.
Yu Kung is a Taiwanese entrepreneur working in China.
Translated by Emma Liu
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS