A recent slate of opinion polls suggests the presidential campaign is likely to be a three-horse race. That is, unless Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) gets his way. The idea of an emerging third force in Taiwanese politics has been around since the founding of the New Power Party in 2015, but it has never seriously challenged the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
A Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation (TPOF) poll released on Friday last week showed that the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), founded in 2019 by former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), now commands an approval rating of 22.2 percent, surpassing the KMT’s 20.4 percent and not far behind the DPP’s 24.6 percent. This is the first time that three political parties have polled more than 20 percent, but the KMT has been looking over its shoulder for the past two years.
On Tuesday, the TPOF released another poll, this time on support for the three parties’ presidential nominees. That the KMT’s candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), came third comes as no surprise; the shocker was that Ko was polling close to 30 percent, trailing Vice President William Lai (賴清德) by only 6.6 percentage points. A TVBS poll had different results, placing Ko first with 33 percent, ahead of Lai’s 30 percent. Hou dropped from first place in a previous TVBS poll to third, with 23 percent.
Although the TPOF and TVBS polls differ in their results, their findings do tell a similar story regarding one important metric: age group.
In TPOF’s results, Lai was more popular among prospective voters aged 45 or older. While Ko was ahead in the 35-44 and 45-54 age groups, his and Lai’s numbers were actually very close. Lai was significantly ahead in the 55-and-above group, while Ko secured 67 percent support in the 20-to-24 age group, leaving Lai and Hou trailing at 8.8 and 7.4 percent respectively. Hou fared poorly among all age groups except 55 and above, but in that category he only placed second. His 26 and 27 percent support in the 55-to-64 and 65-and-above groups does not offer much of a challenge to Lai’s 47 percent approval rating in both. Ko placed third in the 55-and-above group.
The TVBS results placed Ko first in the 20-to-29, 30-to-39 and 40-to-49 age groups, although his lead was significantly larger in the first two. In the third, he secured 36 percent compared with Lai’s 29 percent and Hou’s 23 percent.
TPOF’s polls also found that Ko’s support was the highest among university students, while Lai fared better among potential voters with a technical college, or high-school or lower education.
Jaw thinks he knows what the KMT should do about Hou’s dismal showing, based on a third poll, which was conducted by his own corporation together with Gallup. The poll found that if Lai and Representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) ran on the same ticket they would win the presidential election against any KMT or TPP pairing in a three-way race. If Hou and Ko appeared on the same ticket, they would beat Lai and Hsiao by about 5 percentage points, but a significant portion of that support would come from the 20-to-29 age group.
Jaw’s conclusion is that the only way to beat Lai would be with a joint KMT-TPP ticket. An analysis of those figures by age group shows 58.92 percent support for the Hou-Ko ticket compared with 13.49 percent for the Lai-Hsiao pairing in the 20-to-29 age group. Unfortunately for Jaw, if the other two polls are accurate, that support is from Ko’s supporters, not Hou’s.
Ko has no reason to join forces with the KMT, especially if the latter expects him to stand as vice president. Meanwhile, Lai and his team need to study the implications of these poll findings.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS