At the end of last month, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed the Anti-Homosexuality Act, a law that institutionalizes the persecution of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) people and, more broadly, promotes a culture of hate.
The bill is one of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQI+ laws. It criminalizes consensual same-sex relations and imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment for anyone who engages in gay sex, and the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” — defined as homosexual acts involving individuals infected with HIV, children or disabled people.
Equally worrying is the broad and vague provision that outlaws the “promotion of homosexuality” and mandates a prison term of up to 20 years for offenders.
Beyond being punitive, this anti-gay legislation infringes on Ugandans’ constitutional rights, including the right to privacy, freedom from discrimination and from cruel and degrading treatment, and the presumption of innocence.
By criminalizing the promotion of homosexuality, the Anti-Homosexuality Act shuts down debate, limits access to HIV-related services, and curtails freedom of expression, thought, assembly and association.
The bill breaches several regional and international human rights treaties to which Uganda is a party. These include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, both of which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, which the UN Human Rights Committee and courts have interpreted to include sexual orientation.
The devastating effect of this draconian law on LGBTQI+ people in Uganda cannot be overstated. The Ugandan government has effectively sanctioned mob justice, and people fear that expressing their sexuality or gender identity could put them at risk of violence.
The introduction of the bill to parliament in early March precipitated a rise in anti-gay human rights violations. From March 21 and April 20, the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum documented 59 unlawful arrests, evictions and assaults targeting LGBTQI+ people.
Codifying discrimination is by no means an aberration in Uganda, where the LGBTQI+ population has long contended with societal homophobia and the absence of legal protections.
The country’s first anti-gay legislation was inherited from British colonialists. Codified in the 1950 Penal Code, and later strengthened in the 1990s, the law imposes severe punishments for same-sex acts, categorizing them as “against the order of nature.”
The push for tougher legislation has intensified over the past decade. In December 2013, Uganda’s parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014, with punishments for homosexual behavior almost as severe as in last year’s version.
However, the Ugandan Court of Appeal later struck it down, on the grounds that the parliament was inquorate at the time of the vote. Since then, populist lawmakers have repeatedly introduced similar bills.
Funded by Western right-wing and religious groups, these self-serving Ugandan politicians employ incendiary homophobic rhetoric under the guise of defending “African values” against what they perceive as the West’s imposition of LGBTQI+ rights.
However, they fail to recognize that homophobia is a legacy of Western colonialism.
The role of Christian fundamentalist groups in exporting hate and homophobia to Africa was on full display at a recent interparliamentary conference on family values held in Kampala.
Family Watch International, an Arizona-based organization deemed an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, helped fund and organize the event, which was attended by religious leaders, youth activists and members of parliament from more than 20 African countries. The attendees called on their governments to criminalize homosexuality and same-sex unions, and to enact stricter penalties for engaging in gay sex, further marginalizing and stigmatizing LGBTQI+ people and fostering an environment of fear and hostility.
For all the talk of an anti-African cultural agenda, signing the Anti-Homosexuality Act into law is a distraction from issues such as rising inflation, an under-resourced health system and increased insecurity.
The Ugandan government has historically scapegoated sexual minorities to deflect public criticism of its failed policies and to consolidate support. By targeting a marginalized group for vilification, the government seeks to create a common enemy and manipulate pre-existing biases to advance its political interests.
However, despite the escalating threats, the fight for LGBTQI+ rights in Uganda continues. Human rights advocates in the country have initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the bill. The outcome remains uncertain, but there is hope that, like its predecessor in 2014, the new law might not survive.
The LGBTQI+ community and advocates for the rights of sexual minorities in Uganda must be commended for their unwavering resilience and determination.
However, achieving a truly inclusive society requires Ugandans to reject discriminatory ideology and embrace the principles enshrined in the country’s constitution: equality, dignity, inclusion and tolerance. Only a shared commitment to equality and justice can ensure freedom for all.
Sarah Kihika Kasande, a human rights lawyer, is head of the International Center for Transitional Justice’s Uganda office and cofounder of Chapter Four Uganda, a human rights organization focused on protecting civil liberties.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS