At the end of last month, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed the Anti-Homosexuality Act, a law that institutionalizes the persecution of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI+) people and, more broadly, promotes a culture of hate.
The bill is one of the world’s harshest anti-LGBTQI+ laws. It criminalizes consensual same-sex relations and imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment for anyone who engages in gay sex, and the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” — defined as homosexual acts involving individuals infected with HIV, children or disabled people.
Equally worrying is the broad and vague provision that outlaws the “promotion of homosexuality” and mandates a prison term of up to 20 years for offenders.
Beyond being punitive, this anti-gay legislation infringes on Ugandans’ constitutional rights, including the right to privacy, freedom from discrimination and from cruel and degrading treatment, and the presumption of innocence.
By criminalizing the promotion of homosexuality, the Anti-Homosexuality Act shuts down debate, limits access to HIV-related services, and curtails freedom of expression, thought, assembly and association.
The bill breaches several regional and international human rights treaties to which Uganda is a party. These include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, both of which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, which the UN Human Rights Committee and courts have interpreted to include sexual orientation.
The devastating effect of this draconian law on LGBTQI+ people in Uganda cannot be overstated. The Ugandan government has effectively sanctioned mob justice, and people fear that expressing their sexuality or gender identity could put them at risk of violence.
The introduction of the bill to parliament in early March precipitated a rise in anti-gay human rights violations. From March 21 and April 20, the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum documented 59 unlawful arrests, evictions and assaults targeting LGBTQI+ people.
Codifying discrimination is by no means an aberration in Uganda, where the LGBTQI+ population has long contended with societal homophobia and the absence of legal protections.
The country’s first anti-gay legislation was inherited from British colonialists. Codified in the 1950 Penal Code, and later strengthened in the 1990s, the law imposes severe punishments for same-sex acts, categorizing them as “against the order of nature.”
The push for tougher legislation has intensified over the past decade. In December 2013, Uganda’s parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014, with punishments for homosexual behavior almost as severe as in last year’s version.
However, the Ugandan Court of Appeal later struck it down, on the grounds that the parliament was inquorate at the time of the vote. Since then, populist lawmakers have repeatedly introduced similar bills.
Funded by Western right-wing and religious groups, these self-serving Ugandan politicians employ incendiary homophobic rhetoric under the guise of defending “African values” against what they perceive as the West’s imposition of LGBTQI+ rights.
However, they fail to recognize that homophobia is a legacy of Western colonialism.
The role of Christian fundamentalist groups in exporting hate and homophobia to Africa was on full display at a recent interparliamentary conference on family values held in Kampala.
Family Watch International, an Arizona-based organization deemed an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, helped fund and organize the event, which was attended by religious leaders, youth activists and members of parliament from more than 20 African countries. The attendees called on their governments to criminalize homosexuality and same-sex unions, and to enact stricter penalties for engaging in gay sex, further marginalizing and stigmatizing LGBTQI+ people and fostering an environment of fear and hostility.
For all the talk of an anti-African cultural agenda, signing the Anti-Homosexuality Act into law is a distraction from issues such as rising inflation, an under-resourced health system and increased insecurity.
The Ugandan government has historically scapegoated sexual minorities to deflect public criticism of its failed policies and to consolidate support. By targeting a marginalized group for vilification, the government seeks to create a common enemy and manipulate pre-existing biases to advance its political interests.
However, despite the escalating threats, the fight for LGBTQI+ rights in Uganda continues. Human rights advocates in the country have initiated legal proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of the bill. The outcome remains uncertain, but there is hope that, like its predecessor in 2014, the new law might not survive.
The LGBTQI+ community and advocates for the rights of sexual minorities in Uganda must be commended for their unwavering resilience and determination.
However, achieving a truly inclusive society requires Ugandans to reject discriminatory ideology and embrace the principles enshrined in the country’s constitution: equality, dignity, inclusion and tolerance. Only a shared commitment to equality and justice can ensure freedom for all.
Sarah Kihika Kasande, a human rights lawyer, is head of the International Center for Transitional Justice’s Uganda office and cofounder of Chapter Four Uganda, a human rights organization focused on protecting civil liberties.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS