Local media last week reported on a Coast Guard Administration officer in Penghu County who allowed four Chinese to disembark a yacht and wander around freely for several days without an entry permit, sparking shock and concern over national security.
Four Chinese citizens and one US citizen, traveling on a Saint Kitts and Nevis-registered yacht from Quanzhou in China’s Fujian Province to Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture, sought temporary shelter from Typhoon Mawar in Penghu County’s Magong Port on May 27. The incident attracted attention as one of the Chinese crew uploaded video footage of their interaction with a coast guard officer, a man surnamed Lin (林) who was deputy head of the inspection office at Magong Port, to Chinese social network platform Xiaohongshu, and it was widely shared on Douyin.
The footage showed Lin telling the crew that the Maritime Port Bureau would allow the yacht to take shelter in the port, but they must obtain approval from the National Immigration Agency to disembark, or notify the Customs Administration if they purchased any products.
However, Lin said he was aware that the Chinese crew members had already snuck on land in the morning. He advised them to be careful and not to get caught if they wanted to sneak out to go shopping again, instructing them to be on the yacht when he came to take the daily roll call. Before that interaction, the footage showed a crew member saying that they did not have an entry permit and Taiwan does not allow entry to Chinese tourists. After the negotiation, he said that they were free to wander around, enjoying the delicious food and beautiful scenery of Penghu. The video included clips of the crew member eating and walking around a local market, viewing scenic spots and flaunting how they enjoyed a “self-guided tour” in Taiwan without an entry permit.
The yacht was docked for 10 days and sailed off on June 5. After the incident was reported, the Coast Guard Administration’s Kinmen-Matsu-Penghu branch issued a statement saying that Lin had been removed from his position and would be punished in accordance with to the law, while coast guard officers would receive additional training to prevent such incidents.
While it is unknown why the Chinese crew knowingly broke the law and whether similar cases are rare or not, the incident showed how easily foreign nationals can bypass customs, immigration and security — three of the four “CIQS” border security checkpoints (along with quarantine) — and raised concerns about how common such incidents are, while reflecting a lack of legal and crisis awareness among Taiwanese.
China has significantly increased political and military pressure on Taiwan in the hopes of annexing it, while more democratic countries are warning of China’s increasingly aggressive stance and military buildup in the Indo-Pacific region. The outlying Penghu islands would be the front line in the event of a Chinese attack and coast guard personnel stationed there should be especially vigilant, but the officer in this case showed a lack of awareness. The incident could have resulted in a national security breach if the intruders had had malicious intent.
Although hostility against Chinese or any foreigner is not encouraged, the Coast Guard Administration should take the incident as a warning, and assess its standard procedures to uncover any systemic flaws that need to be addressed to prevent a security breach, while improving the training of its officers, including their awareness of the law.
While the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is trying to establish a “new normal” by frequently sending military aircraft and vessels across the Taiwan Strait’s median line and holding drills near Taiwan, and the number of cyberattacks is growing each year, the government should ensure Taiwanese are aware of China’s “hybrid warfare” strategies, so that they can identify possible threats and protect against them.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval