Taiwan legalized the entry of migrant workers from Southeast Asia in 1992. Migrant workers are seen as an economic short-term presence that brings material benefits to the nation, but also a degree of conflict.
Their presence in Taiwan has brought more productivity in the labor market, contributed to cultural diversity and reduced the stress of many families needing to organize care for elderly members at home.
However, it has not all been good news. Migrant workers have also been subject to unreasonable demands within the system, such as paying high agency fees, not being allowed to freely change employers and having different pay compared with Taiwanese workers doing the same job. At the same time, they have been blamed for stealing jobs from local workers and contributing to declining labor conditions.
As the economy developed, the number of migrant workers increased, and with it discrimination and misunderstanding. This has led to their alienation, both from their own, but also from the perspective of the local population.
Most Taiwanese are unfamiliar with their religion and culture, the way they dress and their dietary habits, and often view them differently based upon their appearance and country of origin. It is common for migrant workers to be mistreated or at least be given unequal treatment, especially when compared with visitors from Western countries or people with white skin, whose festivals Taiwanese often celebrate and whose languages Taiwanese learn.
Migrants say that having the freedom to change jobs is a basic right; employers’ groups fear that if migrant workers are contractually free to change jobs that there will be no one to care for the severely disabled.
Prospective employers are unfamiliar with applications and follow-up services for migrant workers, or lack the time to do these things themselves, and so often outsource these processes to agencies. These agencies are formed by market supply and demand. Many migrant workers are obliged to take out loans to pay the high agency fees before coming to Taiwan, and in many countries, local agents or organizations dock workers’ wages unreasonably and then send them to Taiwan, where local agents also dock their wages as an agent’s fee or as a deposit.
The vast majority of the information Taiwanese receive about migrant workers’ situation comes from the media, via the news, the Internet, Twitter, Facebook and other social media. Mass media has gradually come to have an all-pervasive influence on opinion and set the parameters for debate. In media psychology, the influence of mass media on the actions, behavior and opinions of individuals and audiences is referred to as mass media influence, and its effect can be negative or positive.
Media psychology uses different perspectives of psychology to explore human interaction with technology in spite of worries about the negative effects of technology on society. As can be seen in recent years, online bullying and sensationalist news is ubiquitous. The power of mass media can make a person or event receive a good response, but also give the audience a negative impression of the subject.
The perspectives of migrant workers are underrepresented in the media, and when reports do appear they are focused on crime and controversial issues. News stories are reconstructions of a part of an actual phenomenon. Different frames influence people’s perceptions of an event or issue. It has also been found that the public is largely unfamiliar with migrants’ salary issues. From controversial to civil issues, public opinion tends to have a negative impression of migrant workers.
However, the majority of Taiwanese agree that the cultural diversity that migrant workers bring is positive.
The most common problems encountered by migrant workers are being labeled, ignored, stereotyped or receiving unfriendly treatment. The parameters of the debate set by the media can limit what readers understand. For this reason, it is important for readers to seek facts outside of these media-defined parameters. The news media are not the only platform that influences Taiwanese’s attitude toward migrant workers. Although there are many other variables that affect the public, the news media are the fastest way to understand them.
Society can approach migrant workers from different perspectives and think beyond the frame to see the facts outside it. If people can treat others kindly, they can receive feedback, and the whole society could be improved, starting with the individual. After the label of “migrant worker” has been removed, Taiwanese would see that these individuals are no different from them.
If people can create a more welcoming environment, more migrant workers might want to come to Taiwan. Migrant workers are part of Taiwan’s productivity and cultural diversity; they are essential for the nation. While making Taiwan’s economic and social structure better, improving these perceptions would lead to better integration between migrant workers and Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-yu is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises