Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was last month invited to deliver a speech at National Chengchi University, where he caused an uproar by saying that if university graduates cannot earn a high starting salary, the departments from which they graduate should be downsized.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) said that university is first and foremost for students to learn how to make a living. Chang’s reminder is worth thinking about.
The starting salary of university graduates depends on many factors, with industrial structure and workforce demand playing an important role. Either way, university departments and their curriculums should enable students to embark on their careers after they graduate.
The education students receive should also help them improve themselves, earn promotions and develop their skills in different fields. In other words, university departments should offer “basic vocational education.”
According to the Technical and Vocational Education Act (技術及職業教育法), basic vocational education aims to “provide students with the professional knowledge, skills, and professional ethics and self-restraint required to join the workforce, and establish a sense of pride in their future technical or vocational profession.”
However, not a single word is mentioned about vocational training in the University Act (大學法).
Article 1 states: “Universities shall have as their objectives conducting academic research, training and educating highly skilled people, enhancing culture, serving society, and boosting national development.”
The statement is not wrong, but it should be made clear to university students that eventually they must find a job and earn a living.
The current laws imply that university students should devote themselves only to the pursuit of knowledge, and that they should attend graduate schools to obtain a master’s and doctoral degrees. Students have no idea what will happen after they complete their studies.
Vocational schools’ mottos often demonstrate the objective of cultivating students through basic vocational education.
My alma mater, the Affiliated Industrial Vocational High School of National Changhua University of Education, has the motto of “Honesty, Integrity, Professionalism, Excellence.” Students are expected to acquire professional expertise (knowledge) and practical skills (technique). They should also base what they have learned on honesty and integrity. This is in accordance with the Technical and Vocational Education Act.
After my classmates and I graduated, we chose different career paths, but all of us have adhered to the school motto and contributed whatever we could to society.
Most vocational schools, as well as technical and vocational colleges and universities, have maintained the goal of offering basic vocational education to students.
Many university students look down upon basic vocational education, believing that it is only meant for students attending technical and vocational schools.
The truth is that in medical schools, which are the hardest to get in through college entrance examinations, every student is required to complete their internship before becoming a licensed doctor of medicine. Being a medical intern is essentially a part of basic vocational education.
Similarly, to become a licensed lawyer, artist, athlete or healthcare worker, one needs to go through the process of basic vocational training. Students from those departments usually do not have difficulty landing a job, although the starting salary varies from person to person.
If a university department does not provide any plan for vocational education, students are certain to feel confused and uncertain about their future.
The issue of a low starting salary is not merely an educational problem. That said, all university departments should make an effort to offer basic vocational education for students.
Teachers should also highlight the connections between education and career training, so that students can utilize the assistance they need and be at ease.
Huang Rong-wen is an adjunct professor at National Changhua University of Education and a former principal of the Affiliated Industrial Vocational High School of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Emma Liu
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Swiftly following the conclusion of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) China trip, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office unveiled 10 new policy measures for Taiwan. The measures, covering youth exchanges, agricultural and fishery imports, resumption of certain flights and cultural and media cooperation, appear to offer “incentives” for cross-strait engagement. However, viewed within the political context, their significance lies not in promoting exchanges but in redefining who is qualified to represent Taiwan in dialogue with China. First, the policy statement proposes a “normalized communication mechanism” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This would shift cross-strait interaction from
RSS