Now that the main political parties have announced their presidential candidates, election campaigns are being rolled out.
Support for the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), has remained high in several public opinion polls.
However, the results of last year’s local elections show that Lai should be more attentive to economic issues. If he fails to address the economy in a more satisfying way, he could jeopardize his and the DPP’s political future.
The DPP’s performance in the local elections was affected by many political factors, including inappropriate nominations, thesis scandals and mismanagement of COVID-19 outbreaks.
However, the main issue was the economy.
While campaigning last year, the DPP did not talk about how it would cope with rising housing prices. It did not say anything about high mortgages and interest rates. Only after the election did the DPP propose to amend the Equalization of Land Rights Act (平均地權條例).
Similarly, the party knew that inflation was distressing voters, but it was only after upsets in the local elections that it started to work with major retailers to mitigate price hikes.
The DPP did not say how it would arrange the NT$40 billion (US$1.3 billion) from surplus tax revenues, and only after the elections did it announce plans to give people a once-off cash payment of NT$6,000.
Obviously, the DPP neglected the importance of the economy. Not until later did it realize that economic issues would upset the public and lead to its losses in the local elections.
With campaigning starting for the presidential and legislative elections, the issue of the economy should be taken even more seriously.
It is clear that inflation has continued to plague the public.
The media have reported that Taiwan’s economic situation is not too bad, given that the inflation rate has remained between 2 to 3 percent.
Nevertheless, people are still facing soaring consumer goods prices. History has shown that public distress caused by inflation can topple a government. The DPP must take heed of that.
Moreover, Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data show that an economic recession in the first half of this year has resulted in a decline in the job vacancy rate in the manufacturing and service sectors. The rate has dropped to 2.57 percent — the lowest in the past 13 years.
Additionally, only 28.2 percent of companies plan to give their employees a raise, the lowest figure in the past three years.
Lai must address the economy cautiously. Soaring prices of goods and a drop in job openings might have a huge effect on the presidential election.
Cheng Ming-te is a professor in Taipei City University of Science and Technology’s department of business administration.
Translated by Emma Liu
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when